PIII mobile ready, but not yet

Intel has once again come under fire for failing to deliver a chip on time, but this time the company claims it is not at fault and has nothing to hide.

Published reports last week suggest that Intel was forced to delay the launch of the mobile Pentium III processor from September to November because of product glitches. However, the chip giant had a different story to tell.

Intel officials say the confusion dates from one month ago, when the desktop version of the 0.18-micron mobile processor -- code-named Coppermine -- was delayed from September to November. At that time, the officials say, PC manufacturers were given the choice of launching notebooks with the mobile Pentium III in September as planned, or in November in conjunction with the desktop chips.

Intel claims the vendors agreed to hold off the mobile launch so the desktop and mobile products could be announced together in November. It was the manufacturers' decision, and not product glitches, that led to the delayed launch of the mobile chip, Intel representatives say.

Most notebook vendors were unwilling to comment on the explosive issue, but one of the top four vendors confirmed Intel's version of the events under condition of anonymity.

"That is more or less my recollection of the events," said an official from the notebook vendor.

Intel accepts its part of the responsibility for the confusion caused by delaying the launch of the desktop Coppermine chips in the first place. But the company maintains the decision to hold off the launch of the mobile version was that of the manufacturers.

"We didn't do anybody any favours by getting Coppermine out later," says Seth Walker, an Intel spokesperson. "But the mobile stuff is ready."

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Dan Briody

PC World

Comments

Comments are now closed.

Latest News Articles

Most Popular Articles

Follow Us

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Resources

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?