3D Blaster GeForce

The GeForce 256 GPU features a 256-bit QuadPipe rendering engine, consisting of four independent 3D rendering engines working in parallel to improve graphics without dropping performance.

The bottom line is that the new processor will take away a considerable amount of 3D graphics processing traditionally performed by your computer's CPU and perform it on board the graphics card to vastly improve 3D graphics on your screen.

We ran several benchmarks on the 3D Blaster and were pleasantly surprised by some of the results. In fact it's fair to say we were pretty excited.

We used two machines as test platforms - an Intel PII 300MHz with 64MB of RAM and an AMD Athlon 550MHz with 128MB of RAM. We assessed 2D graphics performance using PC World Bench 98 and discovered no real differences there between the GeForce card and cards based on TNT2, Voodoo3 and G400. When we moved to the 3D arena, things began to change.

3DMark99 Max didn't yield much difference, as its emphasis is not based on the graphics card processor, but rather more towards overall system performance. It came down to the nitty gritty when we ran Quake II and KingPin frame rate tests. To give a gauge to measure against, the best recorded frame rates on the Intel-based test platform at 1024 x 768 with a 32MB TNT2 card, were 61fps for Quake II, and 31fps for KingPin.

The GeForce bettered these rates convincingly, returning a Quake II frame rate of 78fps and 44fps for KingPin. The frame rate performance gap widened more so on the Athlon 550. Once again a TNT2-based card had recorded the highest frame rates in both Quake II (69fps) and KingPin (56fps). The GeForce proved its like of powerful systems by returning respective Quake II and KingPin frame rates of a whopping 119 and 86!

Clearly, 3D gaming is the big winner making the 3D Blaster GeForce an object of desire for the gaming enthusiast.

3D Blaster GeForce

Price: $599

Distributor: Creative Pacific

Phone: (02) 9906 8887

URL: www.cppl.com.au

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Comments

Comments are now closed.

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Shopping.com

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?