INTEROP - Massive VOIP tests reveal strengths, weaknesses

The good news is that VOIP equipment among multiple vendors is finally pretty interoperable; the bad news is that there are still lots of potholes that can ruin VOIP implementation.

That's a broad view of results from Interop Labs tests of VOIP gear run on the show's test network and presented at the Lab's Interop exhibit.

Volunteers set up five model enterprise networks fitted with VOIP equipment, network firewalls, application firewalls, Wi-Fi access points and VPNs and ran VOIP calls through them using a variety of VOIP phones -- softphones, hard phones, Wi-Fi handsets and PDAs. The tests involved equipment from two dozen vendors.

The calls ran over a combination of the public phone network and the Internet using a service provider that supports SIP signaling, and then testers tried to disrupt the calls and measure the results.

Some of the results:

-- Network address translation (NAT), the masking of private IP addresses from public view, can break VOIP by making it impossible to set up SIP-based calls over the Internet to devices with private IP addresses. The best option the Labs found was to get rid of NAT if possible. If not, get a SIP proxy server that can ignore the public addresses on VOIP packets and find the actual addresses within.

An alternative is to install a server outside the NAT device -- usually a firewall -- that keeps track of where packets come from and shepherds them through the NAT.

-- Use QoS on Wi-Fi networks. While the Labs didn't quantify the difference, testers say the improvement in quality jumped dramatically to their ears when QoS was turned on. "It was noticeable even on non-busy networks," says Jed Daniels, one of the volunteer testers, who said the biggest improvement was it cut delay.

-- VPNs don't disrupt VOIP. This came as a surprise to testers, who expected that encapsulating real-time UDP voice packets inside TCP packets would cause delay, but that wasn't the case. With IPSec and SSL VPNs there was no significant degradation, Daniels says, although the quality over SSL VPNs was better.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Tim Greene

Network World (US online)

Comments

Comments are now closed.

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?