Certification body claims Vista fails security test

Live OneCare singled out as being below par

Microsoft's Windows Vista OS has already failed a major security test.

Independent security certification body Virus Bulletin has revealed that Microsoft's much touted antivirus product, Live OneCare, is one of four similar products that failed to reach the required standard.

Eleven of 15 products submitted passed the stringent tests.

Virus Bulletin's VB100 pits antivirus packages against a spectrum of known viruses. Products must detect every virus, but declare no 'false positives.'

Vista is, of course, a brand-new product, but a Virus Bulletin spokesman said that this is 'no excuse.' He cited the lengthy delays in Vista's development, and suggested that companies shouldn't put forward antivirus tools for testing if they weren't ready.

Vista's improved security is one of its major selling point, and antispyware in particular has been boosted. But experts believe that additional antivirus protection is required.

Virus Bulletin tests products free of charge. Crucially, it does not permit re-testing, so vendors have to get their products right first time. To see the full results of the Virus Bulletin tests, click here.

McAfee's VirusScan was another big-name failure of the VB100 certification process. However, when PC Advisor spoke to the company it told us that it is aware of Virus Bulletin's VB100 test results for McAfee VirusScan Enterprise 8.5 and is working with Virus Bulletin on a 'discrepancy' in the test results.

According to McAfee, Virus Bulletin has accepted that it was not using the latest antivirus updates available at the time of test, which caused McAfee VirusScan Enterprise 8.5 to fail when detecting the test viruses. McAfee is currently working with Virus Bulletin on this discrepancy and to make the updated test results available.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

PC Advisor staff

PC Advisor (UK)

Comments

Comments are now closed.

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Shopping.com

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?