Stanford applies a clean slate to the Internet

Researcher describes blueprints for a better version of the Internet

What do you suggest to make Internet use easier for mobile devices?

Mobility is the area we have done the least work on. If you want everyone to be able to move about and update their Palm without interruption, the Internet makes that very hard to do today.

What do you recommend?

We're trying to figure out where to start.

What can be done to boost Internet performance?

Routers at the core of the Internet process every packet, yet are connected in topology to only two or three neighbors. They process every packet to determine if it goes east, west, north or south. That's an awful lot of processing to make a simple decision. If instead of processing every packet you route in a more aggregated way it will allow us to take advantage of optical switches. A whole load of little routers, called boundary routers, sit near the big routers. They're the ones aggregating all the traffic coming up from the users. They already know where they want these packets to go. So instead you could put a simple, small, almost passive optical switch that would sit in place of that big router. And the edge routers could set up an [optical] circuit across the Internet to another edge router to which they have a lot of traffic to send.

What about the core of the Internet?

We're literally just starting on thinking about that now. In the public Internet you have people and you don't know reliably who they are. Should we make it so you do know who they are? Or should we force them to reveal who they are when it matters? I don't think there's any reason to suspect that you would have the same solution for the public versus the private. And if you believe there's only two options - public and private - maybe that's not such a bad option.

We're in the midst of a very rapid growth of the Internet caused by massive amounts of video coming onto the network. Imagine if everyone in the U.S. was watching four hours of television per day and all of that four hours of television was being delivered as HDTV over the network. The amount of capacity you'd need would be many orders of magnitude bigger than the Internet is today. That is where we are headed.

The question is could you just scale up the network the way it is today? Technically, probably. It would mean the Internet exchanges would need 10 to 20 times as much space, the routers are going to have to have 10 to 20 times the capacity, which means much more power, and it's very difficult to see how all that technology could scale in a way that you could say, yes, that actually makes sense.

It all starts to look suspiciously fragile -- no fragile's not the right word. It just doesn't seem very realistic that you could get there that way.

So what would you do?

If you ask the router companies what is their biggest problem right now their answer is power. That's their biggest constraint right now. Optical switches consume comparatively no power and they scale to unbelievable numbers. Electronics in routers are stuck with Moore's Law at best. [With routing decision pushed the edge] the core of the network lends itself very nicely to fast dynamic optical circuit switching where the circuits come and go fairly quickly, perhaps every few minutes or so. They'd be established and taken down between the routers in a way that allows aggregating all of this traffic. This I believe will lead to a much more easily scaled core of the network, for these exchange points, and a lot of this. This will enable the network to scale much faster in the way that is needed.

Join the PC World newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Our Back to Business guide highlights the best products for you to boost your productivity at home, on the road, at the office, or in the classroom.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Tim Greene

Network World
Show Comments

Cool Tech

Crucial Ballistix Elite 32GB Kit (4 x 8GB) DDR4-3000 UDIMM

Learn more >

Gadgets & Things

Lexar® Professional 1000x microSDHC™/microSDXC™ UHS-II cards

Learn more >

Family Friendly

Lexar® JumpDrive® S57 USB 3.0 flash drive 

Learn more >

Stocking Stuffer

Plox Star Wars Death Star Levitating Bluetooth Speaker

Learn more >

Christmas Gift Guide

Click for more ›

Most Popular Reviews

Latest News Articles


GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy


First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni


For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell


The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi


The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott


My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Featured Content

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?