Open-source software in the data center

There is a place for it, but it won't do everything.

In fact, cost is not the major factor at Opus. "We often look to open-source projects as a way to get our feet wet with a specific technology so we can see if a product type meets our needs and the needs of our clients without spending money on the corresponding commercial solutions," Sherwood says. Currently Opus is looking at open-source products for SAN functionality, network management and network control.

Open source is also a way to solve a problem, add a new service or perform some other function that has not yet been budgeted for, or "has not been proven as truly useful and worth pursuing," he says.

Because open-source projects, in general, "do not move forward at the pace of the commercial packages," Sherwood says, his company was looking at more development costs to add functionality or change open-source packages to meet its own needs. So one "hidden cost" of open source, he says, is what it takes internal developers or outside contractors to modify an open-source package. However, in some situations, "commercial offerings are far too costly or lack the necessary functionality required and, therefore, are not a good value. In these cases, open source may be a good solution."

Still, for the foreseeable future, most observers say that open-source will coexist with proprietary packages in the data center.

"As [open-source] packages become more reliable and feature-rich, their popularity will undoubtedly grow among businesses attracted to the relatively low cost of implementation," say EMA's Brasen. "It's unlikely, however, that open-source solutions will completely replace commercial products."

Join the PC World newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Our Back to Business guide highlights the best products for you to boost your productivity at home, on the road, at the office, or in the classroom.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Julie Sartain

Show Comments

Cool Tech

Crucial Ballistix Elite 32GB Kit (4 x 8GB) DDR4-3000 UDIMM

Learn more >

Gadgets & Things

Lexar® Professional 1000x microSDHC™/microSDXC™ UHS-II cards

Learn more >

Family Friendly

Lexar® JumpDrive® S57 USB 3.0 flash drive 

Learn more >

Stocking Stuffer

Plox Star Wars Death Star Levitating Bluetooth Speaker

Learn more >

Christmas Gift Guide

Click for more ›

Most Popular Reviews

Latest News Articles


GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy


First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni


For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell


The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi


The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott


My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Featured Content

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?