Record-breaking 'Storm' linked to spam surge

Biggest, baddest e-mail malware ever, says researcher

Storm, the Trojan that Hoovers PCs into hacker-controlled botnets, roared back into life last month in several waves, security researchers said Monday, and has blown by 2005's Sober to become the most prolific e-mail-borne malware ever.

"This is the biggest since Sober in mid-to-late 2005," said Sam Masiello, the director of threat research at MX Logic, referring to a long-lasting worm whose variants struck repeatedly in the second half of 2005, often in extremely high numbers. In November 2006, for instance, e-mail filtering companies reported malware-laden e-mail counts spiking 1,500 percent in a week, and said they were intercepting four times the usual number of infected messages.

According to MX Logic, Storm -- a bot Trojan that collects compromised computers into large networks of ready-to-use PCs -- has broken Sober's records. Thanks to Storm, the managed e-mail security vendor tracked a July jump in malicious e-mail of 1,700 percent over June.

Storm, however, is much more malevolent than Sober ever dreamed. "Not only is it designed to propagate more copies of Storm, but it releases huge quantities of spam," said Masiello.

Security analysts, Wood and Masiello among them, have been drawing a line between Storm's success and spam outbursts of July and August, including one that dropped impressive quantities of "pump-and-dump" stock scam mail in mailboxes worldwide. "Certain Trojans are specifically written not only to make their own botnet larger, but to propagate specific types of spam," Masiello said.

Other researchers are also convinced that Storm is directly related to the jump in spam users saw in July, and are still seeing now. "Looking at the network traffic overall, where malware is being hosted, I think it's almost certainly a cause and effect," said Paul Wood, senior analyst with MessageLabs. "The Storm botnet is one of the most successful we've seen in recent times. And now that's paying off, from the hackers' perspective."

Storm started to gather steam near the end of June, when several spasms of mail posing as greeting cards reached users, and reach critical mass just before July 4, when holiday subject lines tempted even larger numbers of users to click through. "Storm's using more of a 'pull' than a 'push' model now," said Masiello. Earlier Storm bot-building campaigns had come with attachments that when run hijacked the targeted PC. More recent attacks simply offer up a link in the e-mail; when users click on the link, code on the ensuing site -- actually, often several exploits that try several vulnerabilities until one works -- snatches the PC.

For example, Symantec researchers said on Saturday that their honeypots had snared several examples of mail that tried to dupe users into visiting sites where Mpack, a multiple-exploit hacker kit, awaited. When successful, Mpack then installed Storm, which goes by Peacomm in Symantec's nomenclature. "While Mpack itself is not new, the Peacomm/Mpack link is," said Symantec analyst Anthony Roe in an alert sent to customers of the company's DeepSight threat network. "This is a new propagation vector for the Peacomm Trojan."

But although it had traced a new variation on the Storm saga, Symantec wasn't buying the bot-to-spam link. "Internet news sites are discussing unsubstantiated reports that Trojan.Peacomm Storm infections have resulted in a massive attacker controlled P2P bot network that is accountable for the huge surge in penny stock pumping spam observed lately," said Roe. "This appears to be mostly conjecture.

Masiello was having none of that. "There's definitely a correlation between Storm and recent spam attacks," he said.

In fact, Masiello argued that the large Storm-recruited botnets means the volume of spam, and its percentage of all e-mail, will continue to climb between now and the end of the year. "Spam is generally cyclical," with the peak in the last quarter. "They're setting up the infrastructure now" for that late-year push.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Gregg Keizer

Computerworld
Comments are now closed.

Latest News Articles

Most Popular Articles

Follow Us

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Resources

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?