Microsoft and Autoddesk must pay US$140M in damages

A US appeals court upholds a district court ruling that Microsoft and Autodesk infringed patents held by z4 Technologies.

A federal appeals court has upheld a district court's ruling that ordered Microsoft and Autodesk to pay millions of dollars to a Michigan company for patent infringement.

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit earlier this month affirmed an August 2006 decision by the US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, which upheld a jury decision in another district court awarding z4 Technologies US$115 million from Microsoft and US$18 million from Autodesk to settle a patent-infringement suit.

The Eastern District of Texas court also awarded US$25 million more from Microsoft to z4 to settle the case, originally filed in September 2004, and denied Microsoft's request for a new trial.

The jury in Texas found that both Microsoft and Autodesk infringed on two patents held by z4 -- U.S. Patent No. 6,044,471 and US Patent No. 6,785,825. The patents are for product-activation technology aimed at preventing unauthorized use or piracy of software.

Z4 Technologies, a private company founded by David Colvin and based in Commerce Township, Michigan, develops digital rights management technology.

None of the companies could be reached for immediate comment Wednesday.

Join the PC World newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Our Back to Business guide highlights the best products for you to boost your productivity at home, on the road, at the office, or in the classroom.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Elizabeth Montalbano

IDG News Service
Show Comments

Most Popular Reviews

Deals on PC World

Deals on PC World

Latest News Articles


GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy


First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni


For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell


The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi


The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott


My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.


Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?