RepRap: An open source 3D printer for the masses

Project founder on making self-replication technology affordable through open source hardware and software

Are there plans to modify the current design to replace non-reproducible parts such as bolts with parts that can be manufactured on the machine itself, bringing the overall RepRap design closer to 100 per cent self-reproduction?

Yes - that is definitely one of the evolutionary paths to greater reproductive success. For the immediate future I will be concentrating on widening the list of materials that RepRap can build with (starting with electrical conductors). That widening will implicitly raise the proportion of parts that it can make for itself, of course.

What is the current limiting factor with regard to making the RepRap work faster?

House room. If you have a self-copying machine, and you copy it, your rate of working goes up: 2, 4, 8, 16, 32 times etc. In short, it can go as fast as you like as long as you have room for the machines.

You mention three areas key to reducing the cost of building a RepRap: the software used to send the 3D model files to the RepRap, the physical electronics for the RepRap, and the RepRap printer design. What are the major obstacles you have come up against in reducing costs in these areas?

To be honest, there haven't been any major obstacles. It has taken (and is taking) time, of course - there are only about 10 of us, and most of us have day jobs. But -- fingers crossed -- we haven't yet hit any insurmountable problems.

Can the RepRap recycle what it manufactures?

Yes, recycling has been built in from the start. Though I personally think that RepRap landfill is much more environmentally friendly; I'll get to that in a few sentences. The main plastic we are using is polylactic acid. Anyone can make this by fermenting starch, so if you have a few tens of square meters of land to grow a starch crop you not only have a self-reproducing machine, you have a self-reproducing source of feedstock independent of the petrochemical industry. And polylactic acid is completely biodegradable.

So if you make junk in your RepRap machine, or if something made in it breaks, you just throw it on your compost heap and six-months later it's ready to be dug back into your next starch crop. Thus we have a complete, carbon neutral (except for the power used by the RepRap machine -- about 40 watts; and you could easily run it off a photo-voltaic), local, recycling route involving no transport at all and no industrial production.

But I want to move to using a non-biodegradable resin. This too is sourced from biomass, but is stable in the ground. That means that the more reprapped goods that get made from it and thrown in landfill, the more carbon is taken out of the atmosphere and locked away for good. And, in 200 years when we have taken so much carbon out of the air to make stuff that anthropogenic global cooling is starting to be a problem, the landfill sites become our strip coal mines to save us.

Join the PC World newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Our Back to Business guide highlights the best products for you to boost your productivity at home, on the road, at the office, or in the classroom.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Andrew Hendry

Show Comments

Cool Tech

Crucial Ballistix Elite 32GB Kit (4 x 8GB) DDR4-3000 UDIMM

Learn more >

Gadgets & Things

Lexar® Professional 1000x microSDHC™/microSDXC™ UHS-II cards

Learn more >

Family Friendly

Lexar® JumpDrive® S57 USB 3.0 flash drive 

Learn more >

Stocking Stuffer

Plox Star Wars Death Star Levitating Bluetooth Speaker

Learn more >

Christmas Gift Guide

Click for more ›

Most Popular Reviews

Latest News Articles


GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy


First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni


For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell


The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi


The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott


My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Featured Content

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?