SonicWall smashes speed records

New appliance offers enterprise-level UTM performance

Last month, SonicWall rolled out its next-generation unified threat management firewall appliance geared for the enterprise. In our exclusive test of the Network Security Appliance E7500, results show that SonicWall has, indeed, crashed through the speed barrier.

This box offers 1.3Gbps of UTM performance, which is nearly triple the speed of the fastest product in our comparative UTM test last November.

While SonicWall has not changed much on the surface of its firewall, there are dramatic differences in the internal architecture that yield performance gains that leapfrog the throughput numbers of the SonicWall Pro product line. This makes UTM features including intrusion-prevention system (IPS), antivirus, antispyware, and content filtering cost-effective because they can run at gigabit speeds.

Fifth generation multicore performance

SonicWall's NSA firewall line, based on a family of multi-core security processors from Cavium, is called the company's "generation 5 product." The new hardware (six models have been announced already) is slated to entirely replace the company's old Pro series.

The high-end E7500 that we tested has a 16-core Cavium CPU, with each core operating at 600MHz. One core is dedicated to system management, while the other 15 are used for security processing, including firewall, VPN and other UTM features such as antivirus, IPS and content filtering. Also built into the CPU is hardware acceleration for cryptography (useful in VPNs), compression, and regular expressions, which compare a pattern against a string, and are heavily used in most IPS rule sets. SonicWall claims it took 18 months to port its existing operating system to effectively make use of the multicore capabilities of the new hardware.

The E7500 is a 1U, short (16-inch) rack-mountable device with eight firewall ports: four are copper gigabit Ethernet, and four are SFP gigabit interfaces. An additional port is marked for high availability connectivity to another firewall. The E7500 also has redundant, hot-swappable fans and power supplies. Drawing 0.9 amps when unloaded (and 1.1 amps when fully loaded), the E7500 is middle-of-the-road in terms of power consumption for an appliance of its size.

We tested the E7500 by putting it through performance tests very similar to we used in our November UTM test. However, to drive the E7500 to its UTM limits, we used a faster set of Spirent Avalanche/Reflector test devices.

Full UTM performance (including client and server-side IPS signatures, antivirus, antispyware, and content filtering) was 1,288Mbps using recommended settings. For comparison, the fastest fully loaded UTM performance registered in our November test was by the FortiGate 3600A, which came in at 520Mbps, but also carries with it a list price nearly double that of the E7500.

Although firewall vendors are constantly upgrading their wares, SonicWall is the first with a major leap past the gear in our November test.

We had similar results when testing IPS performance on the E7500 (1914Mbps using recommended settings) and antivirus performance (1615Mbps using recommended settings), all significantly faster than the best numbers from high-end gigabit products in our November test. Compared with SonicWall's own previous top-of-the-line Pro 5060, the results are even more dramatic, with the E7500 coming in six to eight times faster on all UTM tests.

Overall, the E7500 provides a dramatic boost in speed that makes UTM possible in enterprises needing gigabit speeds.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Joel Snyder

Network World

Comments

Comments are now closed.

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest News Articles

Resources

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?