Who owns 'public' content?

RSS feed ownership brought into question.

Every day people put virtual truckloads of information into the public domain. Books are published. Newspapers printed. A lot of that ends up on the Internet as well, along with the words of bloggers and other online denizens. All of these people make content public so that others can hopefully benefit from it.

Once it is out in the public domain, who owns it? Well, the author of course, or in some cases, their employers. That makes sense when we're talking about a web Wage. But sometimes, in order to make it easier for people to find and read the information, it is delivered as an RSS feed. RSS breaks down the information into article-sized chunks and streams it out so that news-reading tools can grab it and display it for users.

One of the most common examples of RSS feeds is that provided by Google's Blogger publishing platform. Blogger's Terms of Service states this:

"You or a third party licensor, as appropriate, retain all patent, trademark and copyright to any Content you submit, post or display on or through Google services and you are responsible for protecting those rights, as appropriate."

They do not distinguish between what appears on the Web page, and what appears in an RSS feed. And neither should we. If I write something that is published as a book, then excerpted for Reader's Digest, then included in an anthology, are my rights lessened in any way? No. My rights are independent of the media.

What if someone decided to take your RSS feed and republish it on their site? A company named Shyftr did that a couple of weeks ago, creating a fury of comments from bloggers around the internet. Louis Gray likes the fact that there are more places for conversations to take place. Tony Hung doesn't like people stealing his RSS feed. And Robert Scoble says that bloggers no longer have control of their content.

I'm a blogger, and I publish my content under a Creative Commons license that allows others to share and adapt it for non-commercial purposes, as long as they attribute the content to me. If Shyftr is a commercial entity as they seem to be, then they have apparently violated both the spirit and the letter of that agreement.

By providing the full content of my RSS feed, and therefore my content, on their site, they deprive me of those visitors who would otherwise come directly to my site. If I had advertising on my site, they could also be depriving me of revenue.

To their credit, the folks at Shyftr were quick to respond to the discussion and change the way they worked to be more amenable to the content authors. That may not always be the case with other companies.

In the same way that I can't reprint a Harry Potter book and start selling it for my own gain, we need to realize that we can't do that with RSS feeds or other Web content either. While Fair Use is OK, you can't just start lifting and reusing entire bodies of work without permission.

Larry Borsato has been a software developer, marketer, consultant, public speaker, and entrepreneur, among other things. For more of his unpredictable, yet often entertaining thoughts you can read his blog at larryborsato.com.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Larry Borsato

The Industry Standard

Comments

metanews.biz

1

RSS: Really Simple *Syndication*

With all due respect, I'm not sure the definition/description of the nature of RSS provided in this article is all that accurate. RSS is largely designed to provide summary information on material such as blog postings, not full-text content (at least not in the description node). It might be described as a kind of super-bookmarking, that enables readers to quickly decide if a particular link is worth following. (Atom is quite different, of course, in that it provides for the full re-publishing of site content.)

In that context, the wider distribution it receives, the better, as this will result in more people viewing the full-text web page. This purpose is somewhat hinted at in the most common expansion of the acronym into "Really Simple <strong>Syndication</strong>".

If what the author is doing is publishing full-text content via RSS, the best remedy is likely to stop doing that, and instead supply a summary. If there is a need to publish the full content, in any case, this is really supposed to go into an RSS mod_content module (http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/).

GHD IV Styler MK4 Kiss

2

Your blog is awesome. Thank you so much for giving the using information. And I appreciate all your work and also providing a lot great tricks to the audience.

Green Coffee Bean

3

When someone writes an paragraph he/she maintains the idea of a user
in his/her brain that how a user can be aware of it.
So that's why this post is great. Thanks!

Aloe Vera Uses

4

Nice replies in return of this query with real arguments and describing the whole thing
concerning that.

castleville secrets

5

Hello, this weekend is pleasant designed for me, since this occasion
i am reading this great educational post here at
my home.

Comments are now closed.

Latest News Articles

Most Popular Articles

Follow Us

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Resources

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Compare & Save

Deals powered by WhistleOut
Use WhistleOut's technology to compare:
Mobile phone plans & deals
Mobile phone models
Mobile phone carriers
Broadband plans & deals
Broadband providers
Deals powered by WhistleOut
WhistleOut

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?