Defending "Fixing the Internet"

Privacy is not a binary yes or no decision

A better example might be your online bank, which may require that you truly identify yourself to it with your real human identity before it will allow you to access and modify your bank account. Or maybe your bank doesn't care as much as you, and it's willing to take a verified proxy identity, but you instruct it to ask for your real identity. How am I to know which side of the process cares more about a particular transaction?

Most casual browsing Web sites probably don't require any identity and integrity, so you can access them without giving up any bit of anonymity. Or if you connect anonymously, they can make sure your traffic is inspected more thoroughly than someone who provides a stronger identity. Or if you don't care and it's your Web service, you can give everyone, authenticated or not, the same level of service. It's up to you and the customer.

My solution just says that in the future it should be possible for me to require a certainly level of identity and integrity if I want to require it, and to treat noncompliant traffic a different way if I don't receive identity verification. And I, as the originator, can choose whether or not to participate with a particular Web site, with a particular level of identity (or anonymity) based upon how I want (or how I want my network traffic) to be treated. Both sides can agree to a particular level of identity and integrity, or agree to disagree, and not do business.

In the current model, even if I need better identity or integrity, as a sender or receiver, I can't easily guarantee that across multiple protocols to multiple partners. And for everyone who wants to keep absolute anonymity, keep it. If enough people agree with you, then we'll probably even have online banks that accept default anonymity even though it means that millions of dollars will be stolen from them over the Internet each day -- oops, that's today's model.

Finally, I remain open to suggestions. If you disagree with my solution, tell me how you can make the Internet significantly more secure than it is today. I've thought about it very hard, and I can't think of another way to do it. Living with the fragility of today's Internet just won't cut it in the future. The Internet is becoming everything, and that everything has to be secure.

Join the PC World newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Struggling for Christmas presents this year? Check out our Christmas Gift Guide for some top tech suggestions and more.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Roger A. Grimes

InfoWorld

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Shopping.com

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?