First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
Navy searching for hundreds of missing computers
- — 22 October, 2002 08:15
At least 595 laptops and desktops belonging to the US Navy's Pacific Command in Hawaii have been potentially lost or compromised, according to an internal report that detailed the service's inability to account for hundreds of computers, some of which contained classified data.
The audit, conducted in July by the Naval Audit Service and obtained last week by a defense industry trade magazine despite Navy efforts to block its release, concluded that the mishap poses a "threat to national security."
The report identifies failures and breakdowns in the Navy's system for tracking sensitive equipment deployed aboard Navy ships and submarines -- a system that remains largely paper-based and manual.
This isn't the first time the military has lost computers containing sensitive data. For example, in August, two laptop computers classified at the top-secret level disappeared from a Sensitive Compartmented Information Facility (SCIF) run by the U.S. Central Command at MacDill Air Force Base in Tampa, Fla. The only reason those laptops were discovered to be missing was that Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld had ordered investigators to look into how plans for an invasion of Iraq had leaked to the media.
Missing laptop and hard-drive fiascos have also stung the State Department, the Department of Energy and even the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation in recent years. In August, the Justice Department acknowledged that it couldn't located 400 laptops and 775 weapons belonging to the FBI and the Drug Enforcement Agency. In addition, the classification level of 317 of the computers belonging to the FBI couldn't be determined.
Accountability problems often stem from the fact that individual military and civilian agency officials are appointed as control or accountability officers for a vast array of equipment, including mobile computers, desks and chairs, that's often deployed for extended periods of time around the world. In addition, the process of keeping tabs on equipment is often determined by the individual officer assigned to manage the hardware and isn't subject to any departmentwide or governmentwide standard.