Free ad costs Fairfax a rap over the knuckles by ACCC

ACCC finds Domain.com.au ad mislead customers.

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission has rapped Fairfax Digital over the knuckles for misleading customers over the use of the term 'free' in conjunction with a mobile phone property listing on its Domain real estate site.

Banner advertisements promoting the new mobile phone service were published across Fairfax Digital Web sites during February and March this year. The service enables consumers to view and search property listings on Domain.com.au from their mobile phones.

An additional service allowed consumers to receive SMS alerts of properties listed on Domain.com.au. The banner advertisements stated: 'Domain Goes mobile! Find your next home on your phone for free.' and 'Find your next home on your phone for free.'

The ACCC took issue with Fairfax's banner claim that the Domain mobile phone services were free to consumers, when in reality users would incur charges from their telecommunications provider.

"The ACCC was also concerned about the banner advertisement claims that the Domain mobile alert service was free in circumstances where users of the service would be charged 55 cents for each SMS alert. The charge for the SMS alert was only later disclosed to consumers who visited Domain.com.au to avail of the service," said a statement on the ACCC site.

As a result of its actions, Fairfax is required to stop publishing ads that represents Domain's mobile phone service as being for free, when in fact users will incur a telco charge; post a correction on the Domain homepage; and update its trade practices law compliance program to ensure it will continue to meet its obligations under the Trade Practices Act 1974.

"The use of the word 'free' in advertising and promotional material is a powerful marketing tool for attracting consumers," said ACCC Chairman, Graeme Samuel. "As such, consumers should be entitled to presume that when a service is advertised as 'free', they will not incur an unexpected fee or charge from the business itself or from a third party."

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Howard Dahdah

Computerworld

Comments

Comments are now closed.

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Shopping.com

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?