Microsoft lifts licensing restriction on virtual mobility

90-day restriction will be removed on Sept. 1 for the most commonly used Microsoft server applications.

Microsoft Tuesday confirmed that it will eliminate a licensing restriction that prevented customers from moving virtualized applications to a different server more than once every 90 days.

Microsoft also said it will begin providing new levels of technical support for applications running on virtual servers, but not those running on VMware's hypervisor.

Server virtualization technologies allow virtual machines to be swapped from one physical server to another without disrupting end users. But under current Microsoft policies, customers must reassign a software license in order to make such a move, and can only do so once every 90 days.

That 90-day restriction will be removed on Sept. 1 for the most commonly used Microsoft server applications, including SQL Server 2008 Enterprise edition, Exchange Server 2007 Service Pack 1 Standard and Enterprise editions, Dynamics CRM 4.0 Enterprise and Professional editions, Office SharePoint Server 2007, and Microsoft System Center products. In all, 41 server applications are affected.

This move was anticipated by industry observers, as reported by Network World last week. Analysts believed the time restriction unnecessarily limited the system flexibility that makes server virtualization so useful.

Not all server applications are gaining the new, more favorable licensing structure, however. Forrester analyst Christopher Voce said one noticeable absence is SQL Server Standard edition. Microsoft is apparently trying to give customers added incentive to upgrade to the more pricy SQL Server Enterprise edition, Voce says.

"This was an evolutionary change to the Microsoft licensing that everyone expected," Voce says. "They introduced the kind of flexibility that you would expect for Microsoft applications in virtual environments. But it's not all roses for certain customers."

Microsoft predicted that many customers will be able to reduce the number of licenses they have to purchase, since they won't need licenses for every machine a workload might possibly be moved to. "You don't have to have every target machine licensed ahead of time," says Zane Adam, senior director of integrated virtualization at Microsoft.

With the change, Microsoft server apps running on virtual machines can be moved to any server within a "server farm" as often as customers want without accruing additional licensing fees.

Server farms are defined broadly. A customer, for example, can move a workload from a server in New York to one in Los Angeles without being charged an extra license fee, Adam says. However, moving a workload from the United States to Europe would require an additional license.

A 90-day restriction still applies to desktop applications, such as the Microsoft Office suite. Adam says Microsoft is leaving the desktop time limit in place because desktop programs don't require the same level of mobility as do server applications.

In addition to eliminating the 90-day rule for server applications, Microsoft also said it will provide technical support for applications running on several types of hypervisors. Previously, Microsoft did not offer the same level of support for products if they were running on virtual machines rather than physical servers. Now customers using any one of 31 server applications on virtual machines can expect full support.

But there's a catch: the policy applies only to Microsoft's Hyper-V virtualization software and third-party hypervisors that have been certified under Microsoft's Server Virtualization Validation Program, which launched in June. So far, only Cisco, Citrix, Novell, Sun and Virtual Iron have started going through this validation process.

VMware, the x86 virtualization market's dominant vendor, is not in the program, Microsoft says, which means this enhanced level of support will not be extended to Microsoft products running on VMware servers. Adam says VMware has been invited into the program, but has not participated.

Tags hyper-v

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Jon Brodkin

Network World

Comments

Comments are now closed.

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Shopping.com

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?