DNS error brings Sophos antivirus updates to a halt

Optus, Internode and Equinix affected among others.

Sophos AV update failed

Sophos AV update failed

UPDATE Sophos has resolved the outage as of 13.30

A sporadic domain name server (DNS) error has blocked Sophos anti-virus updates around the world.

Sophos chief of technology Paul Ducklin said the cause of the error is as yet unknown.

“The update is still working in areas, but there are some dud ISP DNS entries that have Sophos.com listed as off the air which haven't fixed their caches yet,” Ducklin said.

“There was some 'not there' data published by Sophos's ISP in the United Kingdom. Bigpond and Exetel, for example, are working fine.

Experts say the error could be caused by DNS caches which have stored a dodgy update of the Sophos servers, and are feeding them to customers.

The caches collect and store server data for a minimum time, dubbed the Minimum Cache Time to Live (MCTTL), as specified by the sever owners. The data, which could be between 12 and 24 hours old depending on the MCTTL, is fed to ISP customers who request access to the servers. Users can be fed corrupt data during the MCTTL if the caches downloaded errors in the updates.

“It is a transient DNS problem that has been cached and once [the cache] expires, it will start working again it,” Ducklin said

Ducklin also said affected users can still update their software by subscribing to an alternative DNS.

Internode network engineer Mark Newton said the errors could clear once the minimum cache refresh times expire, but added Sophos cannot force an update once the data has been downloaded.

“Caches will nuke the data when the MCTTL expires [but] they will retain the records until the time expires,” Newton said.

“ISPs can manually refresh their DNSes if Sophos wants it to happen.”

Tests conducted by IDG suggest affected DNS servers include those hosted by Optus, Internode and Equinix, among others.

Tags sophosDNSantivirus

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Darren Pauli

Computerworld

1 Comment

Paul Ducklin (duck@sophos.com.au)

1

There isn't a problem originating at Optus here...

Optus hasn't done anything wrong. It just seems that the caches at some ISPs have updated already whilst others haven't. The relevance of mentioning, say, Bigpond versus Optus is simply to help explain why different users might observe different symptoms. To reiterate: there isn't a problem at Optus.

Paul Ducklin (duck@sophos.com.au)

Comments are now closed.

Latest News Articles

Most Popular Articles

Follow Us

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Resources

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?