Microsoft plays up Hyper-V versus VMware

Microsoft believes price, integration and timing could help Hyper-V win market share against market leader VMware.

Microsoft is the new competitor in the virtualization market, but executives outlined some of the reasons they think the company can dominate it during a Microsoft virtualization event in Bellevue, Washington, on Monday.

While VMware is by far the server virtualization market leader, Microsoft hopes it can compete on price, features and the strength of its other products, the executives said.

"VMware is ridiculously expensive," said Bob Kelly, corporate vice president of infrastructure server marketing for Microsoft.

Microsoft's Hyper-V should cost users about a third of what VMware would, said Kevin Turner, chief operating officer of Microsoft, speaking during a keynote presentation at the event and using VMware prices listed on public Web sites.

Microsoft has also worked hard to allow customers to manage both VMware and Hyper-V within Microsoft's System Center management software, the executives said. "So we think customers will deploy us side by side with VMware, and then, because of the price, you'll see customers move to us," Kelly said.

Some customers are saying that the cost difference is indeed a factor for them. Matt Lavellee, director of technology for the MLS Property Information Network in Shrewsbury, Massachusetts, said that since the real estate information firm already uses Windows Server to run its Web server farm, the cost savings of using the included Hyper-V instead of VMware proved overwhelming.

"Our analysis was that to use VMware would have meant 30 percent of our potential infrastructure expenses would have been just for VMware," he said. VMware-trained IT staffers were also 10 percent to 20 percent more expensive than Microsoft-trained ones, he said. "Cost is such a driver that unless Hyper-V didn't work, we weren't going to look at VMware."

Microsoft executives played up advantages the company has for selling a wide array of products and services that customers may already use. "Virtualization is only one part of the solution. You need a complete platform," said Bob Muglia, Microsoft's senior vice president of Microsoft's server and tools business.

That idea is a plus for Microsoft. "If their software works as well or nearly as well as VMware, it becomes a challenge for VMware because of the sheer weight of Microsoft," said Michael Cote, an analyst with Redmonk.

Still, a lot of companies are waiting to hear from the initial Hyper V users before deciding between Microsoft and VMware, Cote said. One feature they're looking at closely is management capabilities. "With virtualization, you used to have 200 boxes, but now you have that and 500 virtual boxes," he said. "There's gains, but if you're not careful then you end up with more problems." Customers could gravitate toward Hyper-V if it had features that helped them better manage virtualization, he said.

Tags hyper-vvirtualisationVMware

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Nancy Gohring and Eric Lai

IDG News Service

Comments

Comments are now closed.

Latest News Articles

Most Popular Articles

Follow Us

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Resources

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?