Companies own up to virtual security blind spot

VMWorld attendees reveal vast majority of companies have little or no security in place for their virtual systems.

The vast majority of companies have little or no security in place for their virtual systems. That is a scary statistic revealed in a survey of attendees at the recent VMWorld 2008 conference in Las Vegas.

Shavlik Technologies said that it had surveyed nearly 300 IT virtualization and security specialists at the conference. It believes the survey demonstrates the high uptake of virtual machines (VM).

In general we are finding in talks with customers that at least 99 percent of them plan to add VMs now or in the near future," said Neil Butchart, MD at Shavlik EMEA. "It makes so much sense to deploy them, and now we see data centers full of VMs."

Despite this, Shavlik is concerned that for the majority of companies, security for VM is falling by the wayside.

The survey found that more than 80 percent of IT managers rated securing their virtual machines as "very important to critical", yet only 35 percent of those surveyed actually have security in place for virtual systems.

The survey also asked conference delegates if their IT infrastructure was subject to industry or government audits (PCI, BASEL II, SOX) and if the audits included their virtual machines. About 61 percent responded that they were. Respondents were asked to rate the importance of centralizing patch management for virtual and physical systems, and 99.2 percent rated this as "important to critical."

When asked how they were responding to the requirement to secure virtual environments, 32.4 percent said that they had no security scheme in place while 37.8 percent were currently evaluating solutions for virtual security.

Only 34.9 percent were using an existing security/compliance package.

"We deal with a lot of companies every day in EMEA, that seem to have forgot that the same security risks apply for virtual hosting as with physical machines," said Butchart told Techworld. "Virtual machines are still connected physically to the network, and so long as you have any connection, then you have a possible compromise or risk."

Respondents were also asked to rate the importance of centralizing configuration management for virtual and physical systems, and 98.9 percent rated this category as "important to critical."

"There is no different between physical and virtual machines, it is the same risk and the same problem," Butchart insisted. He feels a lack of education among professionals is mostly to blame for overlooking virtual security, especially considering the skill shortage for virtual environments at the moment.

It will perhaps come as no surprise then that Shavlik sells its own security offering for virtual machines. Indeed, a version of Shavlik's NetChk Protect product is used by VMware itself.

"They are using our own technology for their ESX Server Update Manager," said Butchart. He pointed out that NetChk Protect 6.5 now includes the ability to scan and patch offline VMs as well. By the end of the year, it will include anti virus scanning.

According to Butchart, an end user price for NetChk Protect is typically US$125, between one and 100 servers, after which "pricing breaks" apply.

Join the PC World newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags virtualisation

Struggling for Christmas presents this year? Check out our Christmas Gift Guide for some top tech suggestions and more.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Tom Jowitt

Techworld

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Shopping.com

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?