Facebook users gripe after breastfeeding pics removed

Pictures of nipples and areola a no-go on Facebook

Are breastfeeding photos indecent? The boobs who run Facebook apparently think so, and their decision to delete images of nursing women has led to a minor backlash among users of the social networking site.

According to a San Jose Mercury News report, a small group of protesters congregated in front of Facebook's Palo Alto headquarters last Saturday, singing songs, nursing babies, and generally making a ruckus about the company rule that forbids fully-exposed breasts on the site.

One of the protest organizers, Heather Farley, says two nursing photos were removed from her Facebook page, and that the site warned her that her account would be closed if its censors felt it necessary to remove one more photo, according to the Mercury News story.

A Facebook spokesman says the social net has no problem with nursing pics, provided they don't violate site policy that prohibits visible nipples or areola. In addition, Facebook doesn't actively seek out breastfeeding shots, but rather only removes images after users complain.

Not surprisingly, a mini-firestorm among nursing proponents is brewing on Facebook. An "official petition" to Facebook poses the question: "We're wondering: what about a baby breastfeeding is obscene? Especially in comparison to MANY other pictures posted all over Facebook that really are obscene."

And a Facebook user named Morgan writes: "i have seen pics of underage girls practically showing their nipples on here! why is this ok? i think its wonderful for a mother to want to show off her ability to naturally take care of her infant, on the other hand i think its disgusting and appalling to see a 13 year old girl making out with another girl and holding booze! but i guess this is not surprising since facebook is ran by a man."

Bad punctuation aside, Morgan has a point. Facebook really needs to lighten up. A simple content warning on nursing-related pages would be enough to shoo away more sensitive members.

This page reportedly shows some of the nursing photos that were removed by Facebook. If this sort of thing offends you, don't go there.

Tags Facebook

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Jeff Bertolucci

PC World

Comments

Comments are now closed.

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Shopping.com

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?