U.S. airlines are now piling on to the in-flight Wi-Fi bandwagon, with Alaska Airlines joining other airlines in expanding the service to more aircraft.More than 2,100 passengers have used the service since it was offered in a free trial run on one plane beginning Feb. 26, the airline said Tuesday. Alaska will now go ahead with installing the system on more aircraft in the coming months and testing prices. Other U.S. airlines have also forged ahead with in-flight Wi-Fi, which is re-emerging with new technology after the demise of the Connexion by Boeing service in 2006. On March 31, American Airlines said its service had come out of the trial stage and systems would be installed on more than 300 domestic planes over the next two years. In December, Virgin America began commercial Wi-Fi service after a brief passenger trial and committed to rolling it out on its full fleet of 28 planes. Delta Airlines said last year it would have Wi-Fi on its entire fleet of 330 planes by the end of summer 2009. United Airlines started offering the service on 13 craft in January. Alaska uses a different system from most other U.S. carriers. Because so many of its flights go over inaccessible stretches of the nation's largest state or travel over the Pacific to reach it, Alaska is using a satellite-based system from Row 44. Southwest Airlines also uses this system, which connects an on-board Wi-Fi network with the Internet via satellite. The other major U.S. airlines are working with Aircell, which links planes to the Internet via special 3G radios on the ground. The airline said it was pleased with the response to Gogo. More than 96 percent of the passengers who used it and filled out a survey said they would use it again, and more than 75 percent rated it "excellent" or "very good," according to the airline. About 35 percent of those passengers accessed the Wi-Fi network with mobile devices such as smartphones rather than with laptop computers. Alaska said it planned to start evaluating pricing models this week and will set a final price later this year. Aircell charges US$9.95 for flights of less than three hours and $12.95 for longer flights, with a special $7.95 price for access from a handheld device on any type of flight. With so many airlines going ahead with in-flight Wi-Fi, rolling it out has become a matter of remaining competitive, said wireless analyst Jack Gold of J. Gold Associates. It's still not clear whether the service will turn a profit for the airlines, which will be the key test of its success as a business, he said. At $12.95 for a coast-to-coast flight, an executive who flew 100 times a year might spend nearly $1,300, which employers might not cover for anyone other than top executives. Gold expects services such as Boingo to appear, giving flyers access to multiple airlines' in-flight services at a bulk rate. "Otherwise, it gets real unattractive very quickly. ... It's a lot of money," Gold said. Airlines may also start to engage in price competition on the service, he added.
Gadgets & Things
Most Popular Reviews
- 1 Finally! LG OLED TV 2016 range review
- 2 Huawei Nova Plus smartphone review
- 3 Apple iPhone 7 Plus review: including Portrait Mode
- 4 Google Daydream View VR full, in-depth review
- 5 Google Pixel XL full, in-depth smartphone review: Phones just got smarter
Latest News Articles
- Lavabit developer has a new encrypted, end-to-end email protocol
- Apple sues Qualcomm over patent licensing and $1B in payments
- New details emerge about Intel's super-small Euclid computer for robots
- Microsoft will soon end Office 2013 distribution through Office 365
- Researchers propose a way to use your heartbeat as a password
GGG Evaluation Team
First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.
For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.
The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.
The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.
My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.
- Time to ditch Foxtel and the iQ3: How to replace Foxtel packages with cheaper alternatives
- The top 10 best and worst tech gadgets and products of 2016
- TV of the year award 2016
- What's the difference between an Intel Core i3, i5 and i7?
- Laser vs. inkjet printers: which is better?
- FTBrand Marketing Manager - Premium Entertainment BrandNSW
- FTSAP BW ConsultantACT
- TPSQL Server DeveloperNSW
- TPAndroid DeveloperSA
- FTMid Level Infrastructure Project ManagerVIC
- FTApplication Developer - FileNetVIC
- FTLife/400 Developers / Programmers - Permanent - North Ryde areaNSW
- TPTest ManagerQLD
- CCNetwork Security Engineer - Cisco ISEVIC
- FTChief Security Officer l CISSP l ISO27001NSW
- CCTechnical Business Analyst - Infrastructure - VirtualizationNSW
- TPMobile Application DeveloperWA
- CCVirtualization ArchitectACT
- TPData AnalystVIC
- FTSenior Front End Web DeveloperNSW
- FTLevel 2 Service DeskNSW
- CCChange and Communications AnalystQLD
- FTiOS DeveloperNSW
- FTCloud Orchestration SpecialistVIC
- TPMS Dynamics Post Implementation BAQLD
- TPICT Project CoordinatorQLD
- CCSystem Engineer - AdelaideWA
- TPSenior Test Analyst - TAFEQLD
- FTNetwork EngineerNSW