Pirate Bay: Court looks at conflict of interest allegations

The case may be heading back to the district court because of links between the judge and copyright organizations

The Swedish court of appeals will look into allegations that judge who handled a case involving the Pirate Bay file sharing service had a conflict interest, the court said on Wednesday.

Allegations of a conflict of interest were leveled at the district court judge Tomas Norström because of his membership in pro-copyright organizations.

Last month, Norström handed down a guilty verdict against the operators of the Pirate Bay site, sentencing them to a year in prison and ordering them to pay damages of 30 million Swedish kronor (US$3.9 million).

The most likely outcome, if the court of appeals decides that Norström had a conflict interest, is that the case will go back to the district court for another round, according to Anders Eka, who is in charge of handling the case.

The Pirate Bay case arrived in the court of appeals on May 18, and was assigned to section 2 of the court, which amongst other things specializes in copyright cases.

However, Eka belongs to section 1. The President of the court of appeals felt it was best that a section that doesn't specialize in copyright issues handle the issue.

The court also underscores that Eka has not been a member of any pro-copyright organizations, and neither have the other two people who will decide if there was a conflict of interest.

However, not everyone is convinced that Eka is completely unbiased. Peter Sunde, one of those found guilty, points to a document about The Stockholm Center for Commercial Law from August last year, which lists Monique Wadsted, Peter Danowsky and Eka as its members.

Wadsted and Danowsky are lawyers for the entertainment industry in the Pirate Bay case.

"Not any of our lawyers are on that board. But two of the opponents lawyers in the same board," writes Sunde on his blog.

Tags the pirate baylegallawsuits

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Mikael Ricknäs

IDG News Service

Comments

Comments are now closed.

Latest News Articles

Most Popular Articles

Follow Us

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Resources

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?