Facebook and Twitter name names

News that Facebook will be passing out 'vanity URLs' this weekend has the blogosphere's collective boxers in a bunch. Does having your 'real' name on your Facebook or Twitter page really matter to anyone with an actual life?

Tick, tick, tick, tick.

Two days, 13 hours, and 58 seconds, as I write this. That's how much time you have left before you can claim your own personalized Facebook URL.

On June 13, at one minute past midnight eastern time, Facebook will unveil a "username" service that lets you assign the name your parents gave you to your Facebook home page.

In other words, instead of facebook.com/profile.php?id=666572545, I can be facebook.com/robertxcringely -- but only if I get there first. (Otherwise that other guy might snag it. Shhh, don't tell him.)

This news comes via a Facebook Blog post from someone called Blaise DiPersia (like that's a real name), and judging by the giddy reaction from the blogosphere, you'd think it was raining donuts on Christmas morning. Yes, those of us with mostly virtual lives do get excited over stupid things.

This is a first-come first-served, take-no-prisoners/get-your-low-latency-lines-installed-now kind of deal. I predict a small tsunami of HTTP calls that will look a heckuvalot like a DDoS attack over at Facebook.com right around 12:02 a.m.

The problem, of course, comes when your name is Robert Smith. There can only be one. And there are only so many variations of Bob, Bobby, Rob, Robbo, Smitty, etc., until you just say the hell with the vanity URL and go back to id=666784098.

What exactly is the point of having a nom de Facebook? In the future, when everything converges and there is only one social network (let's call it FaceTwitSpace Live!), it will make life slightly easier if all your identities converge under your actual name. And of course, it's really helpful for stalkers. Aside from that, it's just more digital narcissism. (Which doesn't mean I won't be in there with everybody else, desperately trying to tear off my own little corner of Facebook.)

On a related note, Twitter has announced vague plans to verify the identities of celebrities, politicians, and other notables on the site, so we can finally know it's really Lindsay Lohan tweeting about her life and not some other insane 20-something rehab refugee. Exact details on how "Verified Accounts" would actually get verified appear to exist only inside Biz Stone's head at the moment.

I'm not sure I can get entirely behind all this truthiness. The very fabric of the Net could be torn asunder. The next thing you know, actresses might be forced to verify that nude photos of themselves on the Net feature their actual (fake) breasts and not some other actress's actual (fake) breasts. Where's the fun in that?

Oops, now there's only 2 days, 12 hours, 3 minutes, and 57 seconds left before the Facebook Narcissism Fest. What am I going to do for the next 60 hours? The suspense is killing me.

Tags twittersocial networkingFacebook

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Robert X. Cringely

InfoWorld

1 Comment

George

1

Great article and very entertaining to read! I'd like to know how much preparation Facebook have done to accomodate the extra traffic.

BTW, the comment form did not accept my home page labelling as invalid. I would say it was due to the .id.au domain.

Comments are now closed.

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Shopping.com

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?