Adobe admits users vulnerable after downloading Reader

Confirms updater doesn't always work, says it's reevaluating patch install process

Adobe has acknowledged that some users are vulnerable to attack after downloading an outdated version of Reader from its Web site, and said it is now reevaluating how it updates the popular PDF reader.

Yesterday, Brad Arkin, Adobe's director for product security and privacy, responded to claims by Danish security vendor Secunia that the currently-available version of Reader contains numerous bugs, and that Adobe's update process can leave users vulnerable for days or even weeks.

"We do single-dot releases, such as [Reader] 9.1, as full installers," explained Arkin, referring to the version Adobe released in mid-March to plug several holes, including one that had been exploited by hackers since early January. "The double-dot releases, like 9.1.1 and 9.1.2, those are for patches only and work only with a full-installed version in place."

The single-dot releases, such as Reader 9.1, must meet a different quality level for testing than the patch releases. Doing it that way will "get security fixes faster to users," Arkin said. "That helps keep users up-to-date."

Patch-only updates are common in software, but the problem with Adobe's practice is that it continues to provide an out-of-date edition that many times isn't updated with the latest patches, argued Secunia on Monday. Adobe has issued two security updates since Reader 9.1's debut. The first, released May 12, patched a "zero-day" bug in Reader, while the second, issued June 9, fixed 13 or more flaws.

"Adobe does have the Adobe Updater, which will eventually update Reader to the patched versions," said Mikkel Winther, the manager of Secunia's PSI partner program yesterday. "But sometimes it takes days or weeks for the updater to come up."

By default Adobe's updater pings the company server once a week.

Adobe's Arkin admitted that the updater doesn't always work as it's supposed to. "The intended behavior of the updater is that when you launch Reader for the first time, it will check if there are any updates available," he said. "That's its intended behavior, but there are a lot of [PC] configuration factors that might lead to different behavior."

Arkin confirmed that a first-launch of Reader sometimes fails to trigger Adobe's updater on PCs in its own labs. The updater failed to appear after launching Reader 9.1 for the first time on three different Windows PCs that Computerworld tested.

Abode is also reevaluating how frequently its software updater pings the company's servers to see whether a patch is ready for download. Currently, the updater defaults to weekly intervals, with monthly intervals the only other option. "We decided that's the right amount of time after feedback from enterprises," said Arkin. He declined to specify what changes Adobe is considering for the updater, and whether those may involve more interval choices for users or a shorter interval, perhaps a daily check for updates, that would be set by default.

"Security patching is also part of the overall security process," Arkin said.

Two months ago, Adobe announced it had seen the security light, and promised it would root out bugs in older code, speed up the patching process and release regular security updates for Reader. The first quarterly update was issued last month.

Hackers continue to hammer Reader. According to New York-based CA today, there are "a vast number of malicious PDF files in circulation on the Internet," many of them pitching multiple exploits at Windows users.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Gregg Keizer

Computerworld
Topics: adobe reader, exploits and vulnerabilities, secunia, adobe, pdf bug
Comments are now closed.

Latest News Articles

Most Popular Articles

Follow Us

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Resources

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Compare & Save

Deals powered by WhistleOut
WhistleOut

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?