Apple anger: Our 5 biggest iPhone beefs

Well, Apple's done it again. The company has censored yet another app from its precious App Store, this time because it contained "objectionable" words

Well, Apple's done it again. The company has censored yet another app from its precious App Store, this time because it contained "objectionable" words. The app in question: a dictionary.

Apple's app nazis seemingly felt legit English words had no place in the dictionary program, called Ninjawords, so they told its developers to get the gosh-darn heck out of there. (Hopefully that language isn't too strong for Apple's moral code. I wouldn't want to offend anyone.) Non-PG words in a dictionary -- a horrendous idea, I know.

This is far from the first time Apple has irritated iPhone customers with a questionable decision; in fact, we're starting to lose count. But five big themes seem to pop up time and time again. Do any of these ring a bell?

1. Arbitrary app decisions

Breaking out the nunchucks on Ninjawords is just the latest in a neverending string of silly app rejections by Apple. There was the Podcaster and NetShare debacle, the recent Google Voice rejection, and about a thousand others in between. (See "App Rejections Make Apple Looks Bad" for more.)

People may be putting up with the closed system, but plenty of them aren't too pleased about it. Even Cap'n Crunch himself caved and kicked his iPhone to the curb last week. Will others start to follow suit?

2. Carrier exclusivity

Whether it's the lack of MMS and tethering or the network performance issues, iPhone users can always find something to gripe about when it comes to AT&T. Hell, Apple's exclusivity agreement with the carrier has been bashed more times than TechCrunch has reported unsubstantiated rumors. While the arrangement may, according to recent comments by AT&T's CEO, not last forever, it has no visible end in sight so far.

3. iTunes control

The days of DRM may finally have ended this past April, but Apple's practices surrounding iTunes continue to come under fire. The latest complaints center on -- to put it simply -- Apple's refusal to play nice. The company recently updated its iTunes software to keep non-Apple devices such as the Palm Pre from accessing the program. Analysts tell The New York Times the move is reminiscent of AT&T's early attempts to control what devices could be used on its phone lines.

4. That whole flash thing

Folks have been begging for Flash support on the iPhone pretty much since the device's debut. Yet, every time it seems the unthinkable might actually occur, the hope flashes back away before you can say "Steve Jobs juggles giant jugs of juice." (Why you'd be saying that, I'm not sure. But still.) Countless Web pages are rendered useless without Flash enabled, and there's no question it's what customers want -- so why, with each passing update, does it remain conspicuously absent?

5. Upgrade prices that exclude current customers

Getting the hot new iPhone always comes with some hot new deal -- unless, that is, you're already a loyal iPhone customer. When the iPhone 3G S (or iPhone 3GS, depending on whom you ask) was pushed into the world this past summer, Apple flaunted its buyer-friendly prices: $199 for 16GB, or $299 for 32GB. The problem, of course, was that if you already owned an old iPhone, you were out of luck: Those prices applied only for new and "upgrade-eligible" customers. Existing iPhone 3G owners had to shell out an extra $200 to get the same gadget.

The iPhone Backlash

The iPhone's sales may not be suffering, according to some estimations, but a backlash does appear to be brewing. Earlier this week, The Washington Post published a story entitled "The iPhone Gets Easier to Dislike," and just this morning, PC World's David Coursey penned a piece called "As Apple Rots, iPhone Users Revolt."

So is the iPhone doomed? Will Apple fall from its golden mobile throne? Probably not. But little by little, people are getting pretty pissed -- and, looking at the evidence, it's not hard to see why.

JR Raphael shows his less serious side at eSarcasm, his new geek humor site. You can also catch him on Twitter: @jr_raphael.

Tags Appleiphone app storeapp storeiPhonesmartphonesiphone appsiphone 3giPhone 3GS

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

JR Raphael

PC World (US online)

1 Comment

Ken fegore

1

iPhone doomed *not*

Whenever these clowns are complaining about Apple you know the backlash just means more iPhones and Touches sold. Now Apple are 'Nazies' and presumedly Steve jobs is Hitler in your neat little anology to get a few more pageviews? Get real guys,Flash is a proprietory web technology that willfully ignored Mac users for years. Web standards are the way to go. Apple is right to ignore Adobes embarrassing attempts to cozy up after years of neglegt.

Carrier exclusivity is just something the mobile phone market created. Apple approached Verizon but they were too restrictive. In some countries iPhones are sold non-exclusively as long as they have gsm available. Apple don't care about what network your on.

Upgrade prices are determined by the carriers. The provide the subsidies.

If you look at the apps rejected you know that it is a ridiculously low percentage. Buy an Android phone or Pre if you are unhappy. You don't need to buy an iPhone you know?

Talking about the Pre,it's not locked out of the iTunes market at all. It is just not allowed to pretend it's an iPod. If Palm would finally get off their asses and write their own program to simply read the easily available iTunes XML files Pre users would get all the sync they need without having to feel like pawns in Palms pretentions of being the sad underdog.

Palm were top dog in the pim/smartphone market for years, they chose to neglegt their customers and are now trying to ride piggy back on someone elses success, like the rest of the business.

The Pre's sdk is an insult to any developer so far who wants to access the real power of the Pre. Palm simply won't allow access to it. Fair? No it isn't but Palm obviously need to be allowed the decision. Not because they are 'fascists', but because it would be fascist to not allow them to make decisions about their own product.

Apple have done nothing but supplied their own alternative to what many regarded as a mature market, and boy did they give it a good old fashioned kick up the butt. Nothing fashist about that just competition to make the lazy incumbents get off their fat behinds and take notice.

Comments are now closed.

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Shopping.com

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?