Social media ban: should companies join the Marines?

Reading the Marine Corps' order, valid for one year and issued by its CIO, General G. J. Allen, I am struck that they may have it backwards

It's always hard to argue with the U.S. Marines. Social networks do pose a security risk, but should business let the Marines lead the way? Does banning Twitter, Facebook, MySpace, et al, make sense outside the military?

Reading the Marine Corps' order, valid for one year and issued by its CIO, General G. J. Allen, I am struck that they may have it backwards. Rather than banning at-work usage, maybe they'd be better off banning social networking from members' homes?

"These Internet sites in general are a proven haven for malicious actors and content and are particularly high risk due to information exposure, user-generated content and targeting by adversaries," the memo said.

"The very nature of social-networking sites creates a larger attack and exploitation window, exposes unnecessary information to adversaries and provides an easy conduit for information leakage," that puts the Corps and its networks in danger.

Here is my colleague Ian Paul's round-up of security risks and why the ban makes sense. Here is more background on the ban itself, from Computerworld.

The order, however, does not prohibit Marines or their dependents from accessing social networks from their personal computers, which seems to negate much of its effectiveness.

It might actually have been better to limit usage on personally owned computers, which the Corps probably can't monitor, instead allowing monitored social network access from its own network.

Theoretically, the Marines could watch keystrokes, look for forbidden content and filter for malicious code on its own network, but cannot do the same for a Marine sitting at home.

If unauthorized releases of information are a big issue, they may be easier to prevent on the Marine's corporate network than when users are networking from someplace else.

I am not sure whether the Marines have the right to control, or monitor, service members' off-duty computer usage, but if information security is a concern it might be a good idea.

Your company probably doesn't have the option of monitoring what employees do at home, but the Marines remind us that social networks do present a security risk.

Private businesses may be less concerned about information leaks and more about malicious code. Still, banning at-work use of social networks might make good sense.

An equally valid reason might be the amount of time users spend on their Facebook and MySpace pages or Twittering. Sure, there are business uses for social networks, but how many employees actually use them in a manner that's effective for their employers? Versus the number who use social networks from work to complain about work?

Facing an at-work social networking ban, I can imagine employees complaining, "It's not like this is the military!" But, it's hard to say the Marines don't have a point. For a business concerned with productivity and security, it just might make good sense to "Join the Marines."

Industry veteran David Coursey tweets as @techinciter, but it's part of his job. Likewise his Facebook page.

Tags social networkssocial media

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

David Coursey

PC World (US online)

Comments

Comments are now closed.

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest News Articles

Resources

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?