The governor of Illinois signed into law yesterday a bill that banishes sex offenders from social networking sites. The law, designed to protect children from predators who use sites such as Facebook and MySpace to lure potential victims, is the first of its kind. While some are lauding the legislation as a positive step in stopping sex offenders, others are saying it undermines the criminal justice system and sits on the border between justified and inhumane.
"The idea was, if the predator is supposed to be a registered sex offender, they should keep their Internet distance as well as their physical distance. The object is to protect innocent individuals on the Internet from sex offenders," Senator Bill Brady told The Chicago Tribune.
Illinois law already bars sex offenders from proximity to schools, requires registration every ten years, and, in some cases, classifies individuals as offenders for life. An individual can become a sexual offender by committing "public indecency for a third or subsequent conviction." That means if you repeatedly duck behind a Dumpster to relieve yourself and are caught, you're a sex offender.
Also take into consideration the rise of "sexting" amongst teenagers. Sexting -- the distribution of semi-nude or nude images via cellphones and other mobile gadgets -- is an ignorant, but all-too-common practice. Let's say a 15-year-old is caught with images of another 15-year-old on his/her cellphone. Say good-bye to Facebook.
Some may think, "Who cares? It's just Facebook." Perhaps that's accurate. But it's the principle of the law that's more bothersome than the details. The law essentially damns the convicted well beyond the time he/she has served.
This law is particularly problematic due to the fact that social networking is integrating itself into a large portion of Web sites. Even job-hunting sites such as LinkedIn are off limits, cordoning offenders even further from society and basically demolishing the idea that the criminal justice system can actually reform. You go to jail, you serve your time, but even after you're supposedly rehabilitated and when you're allowed to re-enter society, you're still imprisoned.Mike Doyle of Chicago Now makes an interesting point delineating one type of crime from another. "A maniac with a gun can shoot a child, leave them physically and emotionally scarred for life, go to prison for 20 years, get out on parole, and continue on with their lives." Why should sex offenders be treated more harshly than murderers?
Illinois has enacted potentially dangerous legislation. If this phenomenon spreads across the States, the country will be at risk of creating, as Doyle puts it, "virtual concentration camps."












18%
9%




















Comments
Sex Offender Laws
I am on MySpace and have been for four years now. I continue to use MySpace regularly. I am a five year combat veteran and a Marine for life. I unfortunately cannot converse with family (blood and Marine) as they are all over the country and world and will continue to use MySpace as the name states just that, It is MY SPACE! I have a Misdeameanor Sex Offense (No minor involvement)for essentially kissing a woman from the State of California that was EXPUNGED within three years of adjudication. I must register as a sex offender for life. I WILL NOT CEASE CONTACT WITH FAMILY AND FRIENDS BECAUSE A BUNCH OF HYPOCRITICAL POLITICIANS AND FEAR MONGERS DEAM IT IS NECESSARY! I am a voting American with just as many rights as any one person reading this article and I think the way this country is heading is a horribly scary one if laws like this one continue to pass. All it is doing is forcing the truly depraved offenders and predators into hiding or disguising their activities.
Yet another ridiculous and
Yet another ridiculous and reactionary attempt to make the general public feel "safe." Never mind that most sex offenses are committed by family members or family friends, and are NOT those who are on the registry. I am on board with the notion of keeping convicted sex offenders off of social networking sites for one of two reasons:
1. They are on probation, parole, court supervision, or the like.
2. They are repeat offenders.
Our sex offender laws are so asinine at this point due to the fact that they are driven mainly by fear created by those hoping to get (re-)elected. I am all for the protection of children and steps being taken to avoid further victimization of anyone, but at what point do we draw the line?
Law unconstitutional
The law has a vague definition of "social networking site" which makes even places like this comment board off limits. This law will ultimately be struck down for vagueness. After all, there are many legitimate reasons to use social networks, such as job hunting, keeping up with long distance family members, or expressing your right to anonymous free speech on a comments board. *ex offender truth @ www.oncefallen.com
Post new comment