Twitter is 40% 'Pointless Babble.' Wait, that's it?

Surprising that the ratio of worthless posts to useful content isn't higher...

In a new study conducted by Pear Analytics of San Antonio Texas, approximately 40% of posts on Twitter can be described as "pointless babble." According to SFGate's "The Tech Chronicles," the study sampled the Twitter stream every 30 minutes from 11 a.m. to 5 p.m. for 10 days. The sample of 2000 tweets were put into six categories:

40.55% "Pointless babble." Pear also defined these as the "'I am eating a sandwich' tweets."

37.55% "Conversational." Questions, polls, back and forth dialog in an almost instant message fashion.

8.7% "Pass along value." Re-tweets passed along from other Twitter members.

5.85% "Self promotion." Tweets about members' products, services, shows, or companies.

3.75% Spam.

3.60% News from mainstream media sources like CNN. It's pretty sad this is below the spam category.

It's an interesting study that while slightly depressing isn't all that surprising. I actually would have guessed the ratio of worthless posts to useful content would be even higher.

So let's just say, for the sake of argument, that if Pear took samples after 5 p.m. (to include the midnight party tweets), the "pointless babble" category would be increased 10%. Then, let's also say that a third of the "conversational" tweets are also pointless. In an online forum, that's a pretty safe estimation of off-topic posts that don't really add to the value of a thread. Then I'd guess that half of "pass along" tweets are worthless repeats too. How many "Michael Jackson died" posts did you read last month? Finally, Spam is something we could all live without. So in my logic, it is actually more like 71.17% of tweets that may as well be about sandwiches. Thoughts?

Hey, speaking of which, follow GeekTech on Twitter.

Tags twittersocial networking

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Mike Keller

PC World (US online)

Comments

Comments are now closed.

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Shopping.com

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?