Skeptics question OLPC's focus with $75 tablet

They pan OLPC for designing unrealistic hardware and losing its focus on education

Skeptics are criticizing the nonprofit One Laptop Per Child for losing its educational focus by designing unrealistic hardware at a price point that cannot be achieved.

OLPC and The Fuse Project on Tuesday unveiled the latest design for XO-3, a handheld tablet with a touchscreen for users to surf the Web and watch videos. It will be based on an Arm processor and include a software-based keyboard for users to type.

Designed for kids in developing countries, the tablet has a semi-flexible and durable screen that can turn it into an e-book reader. It includes multitouch support "so many hands can play and learn together on the same screen," according to a blog entry on the Web site of the Fuse Project, which has also designed past XO machines. The screen will be made of a single sheet of flexible plastic and be unbreakable.

The XO 3.0's price is "well below $100," according to statement from OLPC. The conceived tablet will be constructed with a "totally different approach" and become available in 2012, OLPC said.

But skeptics are calling the XO-3 laptop a dreamy device that may never see the light of the day. OLPC has been criticized in the past for announcing laptops at prices it can't achieve.

OLPC's founder Nicholas Negroponte said in 2005 the nonprofit would release the world's first US$100 laptop. However, the project was derailed by production problems and waning orders that delayed shipments and doubled the laptop's price. By that time, competitors like Asus jumped into OLPC's turf with low-cost laptops and netbooks. OLPC also scrapped the next-generation XO-2 laptop, which had a dual-screen design many considered ahead of its time.

Calling the XO-3 hardware "vaporware," a blogger on Insight TS said building the device was a lofty plan that looked good in pictures.

"We'd love to see all of these devices, but CG mockups and philanthropic promises aren't the same as real, shipping hardware," the blogger wrote.

The OLPC project has become an unrealistic hardware "dream" and lost its focus on education, wrote blogger Wayan Vota on OLPC News, which has followed the OLPC since its inception. The project comes up with unrealistic hardware designs and price points that destroy its purpose even more, he wrote.

"Excuse me if I get mad at the XO-3 hype. I'm angry at the energy devoted to fantasy XO hardware instead of OLPC educational reality. I miss the original OLPC Mission, where children, not computers, controlled our dreams," Vota wrote.

However, other bloggers defended OLPC, saying the company achieved its goal of building cheap, low-power machines like XO-1, which was a precursor to popular devices like netbooks.

In response to the criticism, Negroponte said via e-mail Wednesday that close to "1.4 million laptops in the hands of kids are doing our education mission superbly."

The nonprofit is focused on education and also on being a leader in hardware design and engineering, Negroponte said.

"Some people have told me how nice that is, but a shame we lost our creativity as thought leaders in hardware," Negroponte said.

But the change in XO-3's form factor is a step in the right direction as the XO-2 design of two-handed reading was not the future, Negroponte said. OLPC had to conceive a new design to keep in line with future trends in education.

Tags olpcTablet

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Agam Shah

IDG News Service

1 Comment

Nicholas Negroponte

1

Skeptics

Imagine a world where OLPC set goals that seemed "realistic" at the time. Unto itself, that would be failing in our mission. When we designed the XO 1.0 in 2006, it was dismissed as unrealistic, yet gave birth to the Netbook industry and, if you do not believe that, you will certainly agree that it accelerated it by many years. Microsoft and Intel has ever interest in not seeing low cost laptops. .... You are welcome.

When we designed X0 2.0, we believed in a two-page display at the time. Call us slow, perhaps, but 1.5 years later we made a course correction, our current design. That has nothing to do with failing to make 2.0, it has to do with better design and one more suitable to children, learning, ruggedness and low cost (half as many screens, dah).

What the skepticism tells us is that we are doing what we should. When I wake up in the morning I ask one question: "Is what I am doing something that normal market forces will do." If so, stop. What normal market forces will not do in this case is drive the price down. Apple is rumored to be on the same track, but I will guess much closer to $1000 than $75.

NN

Comments are now closed.

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?