Dark clouds gather over online security

Google may have realised that they cannot guarantee the security of their secrets -- or yours
  • (Computerworld (US))
  • — 30 January, 2010 09:04

Google may have threatened to leave China to keep us all from concluding that "the cloud" cannot be secured. If that's true, isn't that precisely what we should conclude?

After all, if Google's security systems were breached, wouldn't they just fix the flaw and keep their mouths shut? If they thought they could protect their data and yours, wouldn't they have just done so and not said anything?

In other words, the whole Google-in-China issues boils down to this: Google may have realized that they cannot guarantee the security of their secrets -- or yours.

It seems that all our data is moving to the cloud -- especially for mobile computing users. Is it time to rethink cloud computing?

Threat: Insecure guardians of private data

What does Google know about you? Depending on which Google services you use, Google might know your exact location, what your e-mail says, what you buy online, what your schedule is, who you know, what your credit-card numbers are, where you live, where all your friends and family live, what your interests are, what you read, what your voicemails say, who you talk to on the phone, your detailed health conditions and health history, and much more.

Google even offers a service called Google Email Uploader , which makes a copy of all your e-mail from Outlook or other desktop utilities and puts it into Google Apps, where it's backed up and searchable. They also now offer a service whereby you can upload any file to Google Apps. Now even pre-cloud personal data is moving to the cloud.

Theoretically, all this personal information is safe. Although Google "knows" all your information, no human would ever read it. Besides, do you trust Google with your information? It's a big question, but I would have to answer that in fact, yes, I do.

Unfortunately, if the China event tells us that the cloud cannot be secured, it doesn't matter if we trust Google. We would have to trust both hackers and anyone they might sell our private data to.

Review that list of what Google "knows" about you. Now imagine what others could do with that information: insurance companies, our government, "their" government, marketers, predatory financial services companies -- not to mention blackmailers, identity thieves and extortionists.

Of course, hacking is nothing new. A recent survey found that more than half of IT executives report "high level" attacks on their companies. The difference with cloud computing is that a cloud service like Google could be one-stop shopping for hackers. If they hack one company, they have one company. But if that company is Google, they have everybody.

It gets worse.

Threat: Outsourced industrial espionage

There are three general theories about the Chinese government's role in the hacking of Google, which involved both the theft of Google's intellectual property and also the accessing of Gmail accounts of critics of the Chinese government, both inside and outside China. The government either perpetrated the crime, had nothing to do with the crime, or the crime was committed on the government's behalf by freelance hackers looking to make money.

Of these three, the third possibility is by far the most threatening. What this could mean is that an industry has emerged in China where hackers seek out secrets that might be of value, and then look to sell them to the highest bidder. Of course, that's nothing new, either. But Google characterized the attacks as "highly sophisticated and targeted," which could mean freelance hackers are operating as organized businesses -- sort of like software companies with R&D labs that develop such advanced techniques. They also mirror the GhostNet attacks reported last year.

And if it's happening in China, it's probably happening elsewhere, too.

I think it's very likely that espionage -- industrial and otherwise -- will become a massive industry. Organized crime gangs will increasingly automate the harvesting of personal data, then figure out later where to sell it. This already happens, but I think we're facing a rapid increase in both scale and sophistication.

Hacking password-protected systems is already simple enough, and can be automated. But freelance industrial spies, following the suspected Chinese model, would launch multipronged, surgical attacks or simultaneous attacks on very large numbers of individual accounts. As in the Chinese hack, this harvesting can include the largest corporations as well as individual citizens. One of the targets in the Google China hack was a 20-year-old Stanford University sophomore named Tenzin Seldon , who is active in a student organization called Students for a Free Tibet. That's right. An American girl exercising her First Amendment right to free speech in the U.S. appears to have been targeted by the Chinese Communist Party as a threat, and as a subject for monitoring.

The state of the art (according to reports analyzing the Chinese attacks on Google) is to first target individuals within an organization who have access to sensitive and valuable secrets. That requires intelligence gathering before the actual hacking even begins. Then, send only the target people fake e-mails with PDF, Excel or other kinds of documents and make them appear to come legitimately from colleagues. Once opened, the documents install software that invisibly executes commands that open up access to the machine (and the user's network privileges) by the hacker. From there, the attackers could find and copy source code and other secrets. Much of the hacking was apparently designed to facilitate other hacks, of cyber-dissidents or of companies doing business in China.

Unlike conventional hack attacks, the Google-China hacks involved a lot of people, planning, research, intelligence gathering and sophisticated techniques by very motivated people who knew exactly what they were looking for.

Welcome to the new reality. It seems as if everyone is moving everything to the cloud. Meanwhile, sophisticated organizations out there are figuring out how to exploit cloud vulnerabilities to harvest valuable secrets. And if Google can't stop them, what chance do you and I have?

It's time to re-think the headlong rush into the cloud. We don't yet understand what's waiting there for us. Chinese spies may be the least of our troubles.

Mike Elgan writes about technology and global tech culture. Contact Mike at mike.elgan@elgan.com, follow him on Twitter or his blog, The Raw Feed.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Mike Elgan

Computerworld (US)
Topics: security, Cloud
Comments are now closed.

Latest News Articles

Most Popular Articles

Follow Us

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Resources

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Compare & Save

Deals powered by WhistleOut
WhistleOut

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?