AFACT statement: Film industry disappointed by Federal Court ruling on online copyright infringement

AFACT's statement on the Federal Court ruling on online copyright infringement

Below is the official statement from AFACT on today's Federal Court ruling on online copyright infringement.

34 film companies representing the Australian and US film industries today expressed their disappointment that the Federal Court found that iiNet was not liable for the copyright infringements by its customers on its network.

The Federal Court of Australia today found that despite findings of copyright infringement by iiNet customers, iiNet did not authorise the acts of its customers.

The ruling came after film companies including Village Roadshow, Universal Pictures, Warner Bros Entertainment, Paramount Pictures, Sony Pictures Entertainment, Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation, Disney Enterprises, Inc. and the Seven Network, the Australian licensee of some of the infringed works, filed a legal action against iiNet in November 2008.

They commenced action against iiNet following a 5 month investigation that uncovered instances of copyright infringements by users of iiNet’s services.

Speaking on behalf of the Australian and US film companies that launched the action, Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft Executive Director Neil Gane said he was disappointed by the Court’s decision.

“Today’s decision is set back for the 50,000 Australians employed in the film industry,” he said.

“But we believe this decision was based on a technical  finding centred on the court’s interpretation of the how infringement’s occur and the ISPs ability to control them.

“We are confident that the Government does not intend a policy outcome where rampant copyright infringement is allowed to continue unaddressed and unabated via the iiNet network.

“We will now take the time to review the decision before making further comment on next steps,” he said.

Join the PC World newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft (AFACT)AFACTAFACT v iiNetcopyrightISPiiNetInternet providerbroadband

Struggling for Christmas presents this year? Check out our Christmas Gift Guide for some top tech suggestions and more.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

PC World Staff

PC World

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Shopping.com

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?