Kaspersky: Google hack takes spotlight from Russia

Eugene Kaspersky discusses how he built Russia's biggest software company

Eugene Kaspersky

Eugene Kaspersky

Does that give you a hiring advantage, if there are not a lot of software companies and there are a lot of people getting a good education?

Kaspersky: There are not so many companies but [students] have enough job offers. It's competitive. In the past, software engineers in Russia, they were cheap. Now, if you [don't count] taxation, they make almost the same as in Silicon Valley. It's not cheap anymore.

There's this perception in the U.S. that Russia is the source of all sorts of cybercrime...

Now this perception has been changed. Now American media is starting to say 'Chinese hackers.' It was only 'Russian hackers,' now it's Chinese. It's a perception. It's the same in Germany about Americans. I read an article in CeBIT News that was about spam. And they didn't say just spammers, they said 'American spammers.' So in Germany there's a perception that all spam is coming from the United States. It's wrong.

Why is there this perception? I don't know. Is it the truth or not? Partly it's the truth. I think that Russian-speaking hackers and cybercriminals, they're number three in the ranking of cybercrime. Number one is China. It's quite a big distance to the second one. Second is Latin America -- well, Spanish- and Portuguese-speaking malware -- I think mostly from Brazil, but also from other countries as well. Russia, it's not just Russia, but they're from the Ukraine, from Kazakhstan, Baltic countries, or Israel, New York, Seattle, we don't know. The malware doesn't have a passport, and when the attacks are coming from some territory, we are not sure because it could be a proxy server. So it looks a bit stupid when they say, 'Oh this attack was run from China?' Why? 'Because their IP addresses, they are Chinese.' Come on. It's a proxy server in China that's it.

Have you paid attention to the Aurora attacks on Google and other companies?

We still don't have enough data about that, but there was too much noise, I think. These attacks are happening every day on some companies. They simply don't disclose the information. Why did they decide to start their PR? I don't know. It could be some part of the game.

To pressure China, you mean?

Yes, I think, but not on the government level. I think Google has its own strategy for the Chinese market and that it could be part of the strategy. So they took this incident as good news and disclosed it just to take more attention to the problems they have in China. And it's not just about human rights or freedom of information. It's also the fact that they have a major competitor in China: Baidu. The Chinese market is very difficult.

How is your business in China?

We have more than 100 million users in China. I didn't say customers.

How many paying users do you have?

Millions ... they say that we are probably number one in terms of users in China in the consumer segment. I was recognized by Chinese people in the airport in Beijing.

Are you concerned at all about IP theft and espionage, getting back to Aurora?

This type of targeted attacks is not news, but still the security industry doesn't have the right answer for these issues. Still we are looking for the right ways to protect, and there's no magic bullet against that, because there are so many different attacks.

Join the PC World newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags Aurora attackGooglesecuritykaspersky lab

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Robert McMillan

IDG News Service

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Shopping.com

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?