Mozilla retracts Firefox add-on malware claim

False-positive on AV scan incorrectly pegged Sothink add-on as infected

Mozilla today acknowledged that it had falsely accused a developer of infecting a Firefox add-on with attack code.

The admission came a week after Mozilla announced that a pair of add-ons , Sothink Web Video Downloader 4.0 and Master Filer, had slipped through its security check-in. Both were infected with Trojan horses designed to hijack Windows PCs, the company said. Mozilla removed both extensions from its official add-on download site.

Today, Mozilla said that it had been wrong about Sothink Web Video Downloader. "We've worked with security experts and add-on developers to determine that the suspected Trojan in Version 4.0 of Sothink Video Downloader was a false positive and the extension does not include malware," Mozilla said in a statement posted to its add-ons blog .

Master Filer, on the other hand, does contain a Trojan, Mozilla reiterated today.

Last week, Sothink denied that its add-on had given malware a ride into PCs running Firefox. "For every product, we test [for a] virus before release," said Joey Deng of SourceTec Software in an e-mail reply last week to questions from Computerworld ."We haven't found any Trojan during our test, for both Web Video Downloader 4.0 and 5.7."

In fact, Deng said Sothink was "very surprised" to hear that its add-on had been pulled from the Firefox download site. Mozilla has never said whether it was in contact with the developers of the two add-ons prior to removing them from its site.

Deng was not available for comment today due to the time difference; SourceTec is based in China.

Mozilla credited McAfee for helping it determine that Sothink's add-on was not infected. According to Craig Schmugar, a threat researcher with the security vendor, Mozilla reached out to McAfee, which passed the Sothink add-on code to a team of its researchers. "They looked at the binary and determined that it did not contain [malware]," said Schmugar. "They gave that information back to Mozilla."

Schmugar also said that several antivirus scanners had incorrectly flagged the Sothink add-on as harboring malware. "There are many things that vendors can do to reduce false positives," Schmugar said, including forgoing use of tools that hackers commonly employ.

Sothink failed to do that, Schmugar said, citing its use of a code packer. "Packers are used to compress the file so it's smaller in transit and downloads faster," he noted. "They're also used as a kind of protection against reverse engineering. But they're used by malware authors for the same reasons."

Sothink used a commercial packer to reduce the size of the add-on and obfuscate its code, Schmugar said. "They used a packer that's also widely used by the bad guys," he said.

Mozilla has restored Sothink Web Video Downloader to its add-on download site. "We apologize to our users and the developers of Sothink for any inconvenience this has caused," the company said today.

Mozilla has not replied to multiple requests for comment on the add-on snafu.

Gregg Keizer covers Microsoft, security issues, Apple, Web browsers and general technology breaking news for Computerworld . Follow Gregg on Twitter at @gkeizer or subscribe to Gregg's RSS feed . His e-mail address is gkeizer@ix.netcom.com .

Read more about security in Computerworld's Security Knowledge Center.

Tags mozilla firefoxmozillamalware

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Gregg Keizer

Computerworld (US)

Comments

Comments are now closed.

Latest News Articles

Most Popular Articles

Follow Us

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Resources

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?