ACCC nabs Mwave for Trade Practices Act breach

Online retailer admits it was at fault over misleading warranty and refund statements

Online IT retailer Mwave has amended warranty and returns information on its Web site, following intervention by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC).

The ACCC raised concerns that Esel Pty Ltd, trading as Mwave, was not taking responsibility for warranty claims but instead directing customers to manufacturers. The company’s return policy also required consumers to pay any shipping costs to return faulty goods to Mwave. The ACCC said that if the return of faulty goods is necessary, then the cost should be borne by the seller.

“Online traders should be aware that the ACCC reviews sites regularly and will consider action where remedial work is not quickly undertaken,” said ACCC chairperson Graeme Samuel.

“Consumers have the same rights online as if they were to walk into a store. Basically, they can expect that a product would have a level of quality and performance that would be reasonable to expect, do what it is meant to do and match its description.”

The ACCC added that Mwave has admitted it was at fault and has agreed to consider warranty claims for faulty products purchased since 1 July, 2007, where consumers were denied a remedy due to the admitted false and misleading statements. Mwave will put up a notice on its site to explain the matter to customers.

Tags Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC)online shoppingMwave

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Omar Dabbagh

Good Gear Guide

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Shopping.com

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?