Network stress test tools: Dos and don'ts

How to choose the right tool and get the most from it.

Network stress testing tools are not for the underfunded, the underskilled or the faint of heart. Consider them carefully before deciding whether to purchase them or how to use them.

See the companion article "Stress-testing your network" for details on software from BreakingPoint, Mu Dynamix, Spirent and Ixia. Here are dos and don'ts to help you get the most from these tools.

Do consider how often the tools will be used and in what ways. They are expensive to buy and support. Make sure the use justifies the expense.

Do get full and accurate information on the application and protocol mix to be sure you create a representative test environment.

Don't assume you know what your performance requirements are for the new application, security device or network.

Do engage security, network and business managers to determine current and projected requirements so you understand what needs to be tested.

Don't buy what you can't support. If an enterprise doesn't already have a dedicated lab and supporting staff to test new equipment and applications, it won't be able to get much benefit out of any of these products. They can make an existing testing infrastructure more robust, but can't create a useful lab by themselves.

Do consider consulting services that use one or more of these tools to help with vendor evaluation, cloud services performance, new application testing, etc. Even if you can't justify purchase and support costs, you can still leverage their services.

Do understand the differences between products. One product may not satisfy corporate IT testing requirements. Are you concerned about performance testing (up to Layer 4 or up to and including the application layer), security testing or both? You may find that you need to purchase and support two or even three of these products--and that may drastically change your plans.

Do evaluate reporting and remediation capabilities. How does the tool report test results? Is it good at comparing test results and pinpointing the problems, or will staff have to sift through results and do manual comparisons? The product should facilitate regression testing and provide capture replays.

"Capture replay is pretty high on the list from a troubleshooting perspective," says Phatak. "One of the first things that is going to happen is the developers will say, 'Show me the traffic.'"

Don't underestimate training. These are complex tools that require operation by highly trained, highly skilled personnel for you to get their full benefit.

Don't neglect penetration testing. The products have great value but are not a substitute for systematic penetration testing using attack tools, including Metasploit, Canvas from Immunity, or Core Impact from Core Security Technologies.

"These tools are still no substitute for using traditional pen-test tools," says Phatak. "These can indicate how good or bad your IPS is doing, but they're not a going to give you a good, deterministic answer about whether someone can break in or not.

"You can get a false sense of vulnerability or a false sense of security if you don't understand that."

Tags securityNetworking

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Neil Roiter

CSO (US)

Comments

Comments are now closed.

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Shopping.com

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?