Birst offers concurrent user pricing for BI

Analyst: It's something BI vendors really 'hate to do'

On-demand BI vendor Birst announced Tuesday that it is now offering the option of concurrent user pricing, a licensing model few BI providers use because it can limit the amount of money they make compared to typical "named user" pricing.

Under the concurrent user model, customers pay for the total number of seats they want to have available for Birst's software at any given time. If all the seats are being used, additional workers have to wait until one opens up. This model can result in big savings for companies that want to give many employees access to BI (business intelligence) tools, but only once in a while.

While most Birst customers end up signing subscription deals in one-year increments, month-to-month arrangements are also possible, adding even more flexibility, according to CEO Brad Peters.

Beyond lost licensing dollars, it is "extraordinarily difficult" for on-premises BI vendors to make sure concurrent user agreements remain in compliance, Peters said. But that's not the case with Birst's SaaS (software as a service) model, since its platform handles the access and provisioning, he added.

Birst expects the concurrent model to appeal to companies with "large distributed work forces that need to get information out to them in a more casual way," Peters said. "People with large field forces, either service or sales field forces. That's where we've seen huge interest."

In terms of cost, for a customer with "10 hard-core users using [Birst] all day long," the named user license model is preferable, while the concurrent approach would be better for those with "10,000 users, using it once a week," Peters said. He declined to provide more specific pricing details.

One observer gave a thumbs up to Birst's announcement, but with tempered expectations.

"Concurrent user pricing is something that all BI vendors hate to do. But they do it for enterprise-level deals," said Forrester Research analyst Boris Evelson. "So it's nothing new, but it is indeed a highly desirable feature."

"If a large BI vendor would announce concurrent user pricing, that would be a very big deal," he added. "Birst is too tiny to influence anyone. But if it's a beginning of a trend, it's interesting to watch."

Chris Kanaracus covers enterprise software and general technology breaking news for The IDG News Service. Chris's e-mail address is Chris_Kanaracus@idg.com

Tags business issueslicensingInternet-based applications and servicesapplicationssoftwareinternetBirstbusiness intelligence

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Chris Kanaracus

IDG News Service

Comments

Comments are now closed.

Latest News Articles

Most Popular Articles

Follow Us

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Resources

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?