Google patches 10 Chrome bugs, pays out $US10K in bounties

Of the 10 vulnerabilities, two could apparently be exploited by malicious files

Google on Thursday patched 10 vulnerabilities in Chrome, but did not award any of the researchers who reported bugs the new top-dollar reward of US$3,133. Google's most serious threat rating, seven labeled "high" and another pegged as "medium."

Google divulged no details of the vulnerabilities, and as is its custom, blocked public access to its bug-tracking database, a practice meant to keep attackers from using the information before most users have upgraded. Some rivals, such as Mozilla, do the same; others, like Microsoft, do not.

Google often blocks access to information on serious vulnerabilities for two months or longer.

Of the 10 vulnerabilities, two could apparently be exploited by malicious files, including SVG image files and MIME-type files. Others could potentially be used to spoof the address bar's contents or reveal a password.

According to a blog post by Jason Kersey of the Chrome team, Google also added a workaround for a critical bug in non-Google code.

Thursday's workaround was the third in the last two Chrome security updates: Three weeks ago, Google said it had added unspecified fixes to account for flaws in the Windows kernel and "glibc," or the GNU C Library, a collection of C programming language files and routines that's a critical component of most Linux operating system kernels.

Thursday's workaround was also aimed at mitigating a bug in the Windows kernel. Like last month, it's impossible to know whether the kernel issue referenced by Google was a previously patched flaw -- Microsoft has fixed three kernel bugs so far this year, most recently in June -- or a vulnerability that hasn't been made public.

When asked in July about the Windows kernel workaround Chrome said it had implemented, Microsoft's Jerry Bryant said only, "[We are ] looking into this to determine what issues the post may be referring to."

Five researchers credited with reporting flaws were awarded bonuses as part of Google's bug bounty program.

Sergey Glazunov banked $4,674 for reporting four bugs, including the maximum $1,337 each for two of the quartet. A researcher known as "kuzzcc," who has also reported flaws in Opera to the browser's Norwegian makers, took home $2,000 for uncovering a pair of Chrome vulnerabilities.

But no one received Google's new biggest bounty, which the company set at $3,133.70 last month after Mozilla had increased its maximum vulnerability payment to $3,000.

Google paid out slightly more than $10,000 in bounties, a record for an update.

Chrome is the world's third-most-popular browser, but lost usage share for the first time in nearly two years last month, according to data from Web metrics company Net Applications.

can be downloaded for Windows, Mac and Linux at the company's Web site. Users running the "stable" build -- so called because it is the most reliable of the three version "channels" that Google maintains -- will receive the update automatically.

Gregg Keizer covers Microsoft, security issues, Apple, Web browsers and general technology breaking news for Computerworld. Follow Gregg on Twitter at Twitter @gkeizer. His e-mail address is gkeizer@ix.netcom.com.

Join the PC World newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags patchesGooglesecurityGoogle Chrome

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Gregg Keizer

Computerworld (US)

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Shopping.com

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?