How to move from a physical to virtual infrastructure

You've already got the budget. Here's how to migrate a small physical infrastructure to a small virtual one.
  • (PC World (US online))
  • — 20 November, 2010 11:21

After finally getting the go-ahead to proceed with a project to virtualize a small business infrastructure, it may seem that the hard part is actually making it all happen. In many cases, however, the hardest part is getting the budget together to acquire all the hardware and software necessary -- actually making the switch is the easier task.

The most important part of migrating from a physical to a virtual infrastructure is making sure that you have all the pieces in place before you move a single server, before you put anything into production, and even before you start testing. Much like laying out all the tools necessary to put together a table from IKEA makes the task easier, ensuring that you have everything you need before you embark on this journey will make the process smoother and quicker, and will greatly improve the quality of the finished product.

To that end, it's important to be fully aware of the features and limitations of the virtualization solution you choose. In some cases where the budget won't allow for the higher-end features, you must understand what concessions have been made.

For instance, you may have licenses for live virtual server migrations between hosts, but not for automated load balancing or high-availability, or you may have to forego the advanced memory optimization or similar features.

In the case of the former, you'll need to manually balance virtual servers across multiple physical hosts, and manually link and restart those servers should a physical host fail. In the case of the latter, you'll need more memory per physical host than you would otherwise require because the advanced memory sharing isn't available.

There are several other examples, but these are the most common. In smaller infrastructures, the lack of these features isn't as critical as it might be otherwise, due to the smaller number of virtual servers and the general lack of unbalanced or highly-variable workloads. Either way, it's important to understand what you have in your toolkit before you start.

Building the Network

It's critically important that you have adequate physical server horsepower, ethernet switching, and storage available. There are a plethora of small, cheap storage devices on the market that can handle a virtualized workload, and multi-core servers are very reasonably priced.

If at all possible, make sure that you have a reasonable level of redundancy available in whatever solution you choose, such as redundant power supplies and protective RAID levels, with a minimum of RAID5. In the case that the infrastructure is small enough that there is no plan for shared storage, it's absolutely critical that the physical host server or servers be outfitted with battery-backed RAID controllers, and ideally a RAID6 array internal to the server.

Also note that if you do forego shared storage, you won't be able to take advantage of features such as live migrations, nor will you be able to quickly boot downed virtual servers that reside on the local storage of a failed physical host.

On the ethernet switching side, ensure that you have a switch capable of link aggregation, and if you're planning on using iSCSI storage, information on the iSCSI support in the switch, and specifically, support for jumbo frames. Not all gigabit switches are created equally, and some can hamper iSCSI performance. Seek out switches that explicitly state iSCSI compliance -- and these should always include jumbo frame support.

Building the network is simple once these pieces are assembled. For a shared-storage solutions, each physical host should have a minimum of four network interfaces: two configured for failover -- the option to switch to a backup system in case of an emergency -- on the storage side, and two configured for link aggregation on the front-end side. For non-shared deployments, you can get away with only two aggregated front-end interfaces.

You should configure the storage array similarly to have multiple links to the network in order to account for the failure of any single link.

Once this network is built, you're ready to install the virtualization software on the physical hosts, and link to your shared storage, if applicable.

Handling the Virtualization Migration

Every infrastructure is different, so there are no ready-made plans to move servers from the physical to virtual realm, but there are general rules that you can follow.

The first concerns the use of Physical to Virtual (P2V) migration tools. These are available from a wide variety of vendors, and may or may not be included in the virtualization products you have chosen.

Some are better than others, but many servers can be successfully migrated in this manner, saving time and hassles up front. In some cases -- usually with servers running niche software, or servers requiring the use of hardware keys, or licenses that are bound to specific physical server elements like ethernet MAC addresses. In some cases, using P2V on these servers is more problematic than simply rebuilding them as virtual servers, but there's no clear-cut way to tell without trying.

The good news is that in most cases you can attempt a P2V migration of a server without causing problems on the physical server. If the migration fails, the physical server can simply be powered back on without data loss.

That said, before any migrations take place, make sure to test your backups. Always have a backup plan in place should something go awry.

There are servers that shouldn't be migrated using P2V tools. A common example is a Windows Domain Controller. It's far simpler and less problematic simply to build a fresh domain controller on a virtual server and bring it up as a full domain controller then retire the physical servers once all replication has taken place and the virtual servers are functioning normally.

It's also a good idea to retain a separate physical server as a domain controller, so that not all your domain controllers are virtualized. This isn't a necessity, but without adequate high-availability features, this will provide a substantial safety net in the future.

Other servers can either be migrated using P2V tools, or simply rebuilt as virtual servers. In some cases, rebuilding the servers is a great way to clean out the cruft left behind from older physical servers, providing a clean slate as you transition into the virtual world. Remember, using P2V to migrate a physical server is unlikely to fix any existing problems, and may actually make them worse. If in doubt, you can always attempt a P2V and leave rebuilding the server as a fallback position. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cruft

It's important to keep track of IP addressing and physical and virtual server presence. When you're doing a P2V, take steps to ensure that there isn't a time when the physical server and its virtual doppelganger aren't running simultaneously. The P2V process retains the entire presence of the physical server, including the names, domain membership, and IP addressing, so having two present on the network at once will cause significant problems. The best idea is to power down the physical server and remove the power cables following the migration, then power up the new virtual server.

The process of converting a physical server infrastructure to a virtual infrastructure doesn't have to happen overnight. In fact, it shouldn't. You can start small by choosing one or two physical servers to convert, and let them run for a period of time as virtual servers in order to determine their viability. You can convert one or two servers per day, or per week -- there's generally no need to attempt a full conversion all at once.

Combined Efforts

It may be of benefit to combine a virtualization initiative with a software or OS upgrade, perhaps migrating to Windows Server 2008 for some servers as you transition to virtualization.This allows you to test both the new virtualization platform and the expected behavior of the new servers while retaining a fallback position with the existing infrastructure.

It also allows you to start clean with the new solution, which might be a breath of fresh air if you've been battling various Windows gremlins in the physical world.

Finally, as you progress through the migration, take your time at certain points to regroup and ensure that you're following your original plan. Also make sure that plan includes implementation and testing of backups for your newly-minted virtual infrastructure.

Once you're done with all your conversions and rebuilds, you'll most likely wonder how you ever lived without virtualization, and the effort and any uncertainty of the migration process will have faded away.

More Virtualization Resources:

How to take the first steps to server virtualization

How to set up a virtualization server

How to build a solid virtualization foundation

How to make the leap to virtual desktop infrastructure

5 ways to cut your storage footprint

Virtualization roundup: Four lab managers tested

Desktop virtualization tool eases Windows 7 move

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Paul Venezia

PC World (US online)
Topics: Internet-based applications and services, Web-based Applications, internet
Comments are now closed.

Latest News Articles

Most Popular Articles

Follow Us

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Resources

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Compare & Save

Deals powered by WhistleOut
Use WhistleOut's technology to compare:
Mobile phone plans & deals
Mobile phone models
Mobile phone carriers
Broadband plans & deals
Broadband providers
Deals powered by WhistleOut
WhistleOut

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?