Winklevoss twins open new suit against Facebook

The Winklevoss twins received a payment of $65 million from Facebook in 2008, and now they want more

After a $65 million settlement, the Winklevoss twins are not satisfied with their payout from Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg.

Yes, that's right -- after settling for the paltry sum of $65 million, Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss claim that it's "not enough" because Zuckerberg lied to them about the value of the company, according to the Daily Mail.

As you know, I'm no Facebook supporter -- but really guys? $65 million and you still need more? Rich people! Zuckerberg is reportedly the 35th richest American with a net worth of $6.9 billion. Come on guys.

Anyway, the twins -- who were famously portrayed as the "Winklevii" in the film The Social Network -- say that Zuckerberg is guilty of "securities fraud" and demand to be paid an unspecified amount of money.

Naturally, Facebook claims that the twins are just suffering "a bout of settlers' 'remorse.'"

The original case was brought against Zuckerberg/Facebook in 2004 by twins Tyler and Cameron, along with their partner Divya Narendra. The twins and Narendra were the founders of ConnectU (originally called Harvard Connection), also a social networking site. In 2003, Harvard Connection/ConnectU hired Zuckerberg to write some code for their website -- and somehow, just a couple of weeks later, Zuckerberg launched

The suit claimed that Zuckerberg had broken an oral contract with the plaintiffs, and had copied their idea and illegally used source code for his site (Facebook) that he had been contracted to write for their site. This suit was originally settled in 2008 for the sum of $65 million.

The new lawsuit claims that Zuckerberg/Facebook is a fraud for "not volunteering a more recent valuation of different Facebook stock." Facebook says that the original settlement is "enforceable" because not only did it communicate both parties' intention to be bound by it, but the twins "admit that they calculated the value of Facebook themselves, based upon a truthful press release from several months earlier."

Follow Sarah on Twitter (@geeklil) or at

Join the PC World newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags Internet-based applications and serviceslegal issuessocial mediainternetFacebook

Our Back to Business guide highlights the best products for you to boost your productivity at home, on the road, at the office, or in the classroom.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Sarah Jacobsson Purewal

PC World (US online)
Show Comments

Most Popular Reviews

Deals on PC World

Deals on PC World

Latest News Articles


GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy


First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni


For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell


The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi


The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott


My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.


Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?