Voicemail, standard calls at stake in Vodafone defence

Optus legal counsel urges television ads run by its competitor failed to provide sufficient footnotes on the plan's exclusions

Numerous exclusions to the unlimited calls advertised as part of Vodafone’s “Infinite” plans raises questions of whether customers are being misled, the Federal Court heard this week.

The allegations came as Optus ramped up its case against Vodafone parent company, Vodafone Hutchison Australia (VHA), with the former telco arguing print and television ads run by Vodafone since mid-November failed to properly notify customers of what was included in the plans.

Legal counsel for Optus argued that the plans did not include “reasonable” standard calls including voicemail, satellite phones. Two television advertisements in particular were called in to question as they did not provide sufficient footnoting.

“We accept that... in print ads people are more likely to direct their attention to what the exclusions mean,” Optus’ legal counsel argued.

Optus has sought an interim injunction on the advertising, which is managed and aired by Vodafone Pty Ltd, rather than VHA.

VHA submitted its draft defence ahead of the second directions hearing with presiding judge, Justice Arthur Emmett, this week. The telco is expected to argue a case of what is considered “standard” by a reasonable consumer, a word used to describe the type of international calls included in the plan.

It will also utilise an unredacted version of Optus market research original brought before Justice Nye Perram in a similar case brought against the telco by industry watchdog the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC). The research will, according to VHA counsel, provide evidence of the processes customers may go through when choosing a mobile phone plan beyond basic advertising.

Though aspects of the research were redacted to protect confidential numbers and percentages for the company, a unclassified version will be presented directly to VHA solicitors ahead of a further hearing on Thursday 16 December.

Optus petitioned for the case to face an urgent hearing in order to prevent further advertising in the coming weeks.

“One can expect that there will be very significant advertising, particularly over the weekend,” counsel argued, due to Vodafone’s sponsorship of the Ashes cricket series.

However, VHA argued its competitor had failed to act quickly enough on the advertising. The letter of demand delivered by Optus to the respondent on 6 December stated the telco had become aware of the allegedly misleading advertising on the 25 November - two weeks after the ads first aired - with no action taken until three weeks after Vodafone had cemented its schedule.

Justice Emmett agreed with VHA counsel, asking Optus whether it had been “a little bit dilatory in getting there”.

VHA stated in a letter of response to Optus that it may consider making some changes to the advertising in question, but the “heavy schedule” of ads planned since November would make such a request difficult to follow through with.

Tags Vodafonevhaoptus

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

James Hutchinson

Computerworld

Comments

Comments are now closed.

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?