Adobe sandbox protection hacked

A security researcher revealed that Adobe's sandbox security control can be easily circumvented.

Last year Adobe got the message that it was the target du jour for malicious attacks and stepped up its efforts to secure and protect its software. However, a security researcher revealed that one of the security measures developed by Adobe can be circumvented with relative ease.

The sandbox security control creates a sort of software safe zone--a segregated area where scripts and code can execute without putting the core functionality of the application at risk or allowing broader access to the PC itself. If potentially malicious software is able to bypass the sandbox, though, it can operate outside of that safe zone and potentially exploit the system or compromise data.

Anup Ghosh, founder and chief scientist for Invincea e-mailed the following comments to me. "When Adobe announced its plans to roll out its Reader X product, we commended them for trying to solve some of the major exploit problems they faced through the introduction of a sandbox. But we warned them that while application sandboxes are a step in the right direction, they leave residual risk on the table that will be exploited in the months to come."

Apparently, that time has come. Billy Rios, a security researcher, has found that getting around the Adobe sandbox is somewhat trivial for someone who knows what they're doing. Rios described the hack in a recent blog post that, while the Adobe sandbox does restrict some code execution, "Unfortunately, these restrictions are not the same as, "cannot communicate with the network in any way" which is what is stated in the documentation. The simplest way to bypass the local-with-filesystem sandbox is to simply use a file:// request to a remote server."

Ghosh explains, "The exploit doesn't involve breaking any code or finding any flaws in implementation. Rather, it shows the flaw in the design of the sandbox. As with any application sandbox, the sandbox designers are forced into an untenable position of trying to think of every way an attacker may attempt to exploit privileges and then come up with methods (bandages) to block those paths."

There is some silver lining to the sandbox bypass, though. Rios notes, "Fortunately, it seems you can only pass IPs and hostnames for system on the local network (RFC 1918 addresses). If an attacker wants to send data to a remote server on the Internet we'll have to resort to a couple other tricks."

In fairness to Adobe, as well as to sandbox implementations elsewhere, nobody ever claimed that the sandbox is the perfect security solution, or that it is impenetrable. As Rios pointed out, Adobe did use the unfortunate language of stating that files in the sandbox can not communicate with the network in any way--which is false, but just be aware that any security control is just one method or layer of protection and there are no silver bullets.

Join the PC World newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags applicationsAdobe Systemssecuritysoftwaredata protection

Our Back to Business guide highlights the best products for you to boost your productivity at home, on the road, at the office, or in the classroom.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Tony Bradley

PC World (US online)
Show Comments

Cool Tech

Crucial Ballistix Elite 32GB Kit (4 x 8GB) DDR4-3000 UDIMM

Learn more >

Gadgets & Things

Lexar® Professional 1000x microSDHC™/microSDXC™ UHS-II cards

Learn more >

Family Friendly

Lexar® JumpDrive® S57 USB 3.0 flash drive 

Learn more >

Stocking Stuffer

Plox Star Wars Death Star Levitating Bluetooth Speaker

Learn more >

Christmas Gift Guide

Click for more ›

Most Popular Reviews

Latest News Articles


GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy


First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni


For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell


The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi


The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott


My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Featured Content

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?