SAP to fight Oracle's $1.3 billion jury award

SAP says the amount is disproportionately high for its offense

SAP will ask a California court to reduce the $US1.3 billion jury award it was hit with last November in Oracle's TomorrowNow lawsuit against the company, SAP said Thursday.

Earlier in the day the court entered its final judgment against SAP, basically confirming the jury's award. SAP has already paid Oracle $120 million in legal fees and must pay a further $14.7 million in "prejudgment interest."

SAP said it will file "post-trial motions" with the court to try to get the award reduced, and possibly also an appeal. An SAP spokesman declined to say what the motions would argue, but they are likely to assert that the award is disproportionate to the offense. SAP had argued at trial that it should have to pay Oracle about $40 million.

"SAP will file these motions in the coming weeks asking the Court to reduce the amount of damages awarded or to order a new trial," SAP said in a statement.

"Depending on the outcome of the post-trial motion process, SAP may also consider an appeal."

Oracle said it was "very pleased" with the judgment for what it called SAP's "massive intentional copyright infringement."

SAP admitted that its now-shuttered TomorrowNow subsidiary, which provided software support services, downloaded software programs and thousands of support documents illegally from an Oracle website. The trial was to determine how much SAP should be made to pay.

Tags copyrightintellectual propertylegalCivil lawsuitsSAPOracle

Recommended

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

James Niccolai

IDG News Service

Comments

Comments are now closed.

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?