Using more than one backup program

Ata Amiri asked if using two separate backup program will interfere with incremental backups

Ata Amiri asked if using two separate backup program will interfere with incremental backups.

An incremental backup copies only files that have been created or changed since the last backup.

Using two different backup programs on a regular, daily basis provides extra protection, especially if you're backing up to different media.

The danger of using two programs for incremental backup lies in each program skipping files that were backed up by the other one, because these files show up as already backed up. This would result in two incomplete backups.

A few years back, that was a serious concern. At one time, virtually all backup programs used a file attribute called the archive bit to determine which files needed to be incrementally backed up. When Windows (or DOS before it) saved a file, it turned the archive bit on. When a backup program copied the file, it turned it off. With this approach, you would never incrementally backup the same unchanged file twice.

Most modern backup programs ignore the archive bit, and use internal databases to determine what files to backup. That way, multiple backups are not a problem.

For instance, I daily use Mozy to backup to the cloud, and Cobian Backup for local protection. They both get all of the files in their overlapping backup sets. (Yes, I know that Mozy can backup locally, but I feel more secure using two different programs.)

If you want to make sure that your two backup programs of choice will work together, you can easily test them. Run a full backup with one of them, and then with the other. Change one existing file, and create one new file. Then run incremental backups with both programs. If both caught the new and changed files, you're good to go.

Contributing Editor Lincoln Spector writes about technology and cinema. Email your tech questions to him at answer@pcworld.com, or post them to a community of helpful folks on the PCW Answer Line forum.

Tags UtilitiesCloudbackupsoftwareinternetcloud computingwindows maintenance

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Lincoln Spector

PC World (US online)

Comments

Comments are now closed.

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Shopping.com

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?