Microsoft's new patch raises questions about its tools

Questions are being raised about how well Microsoft's own tools for scanning and patching are working to apply its most recent patch, MS04-003, to correct security vulnerabilities associated with what's called the Microsoft Data Access Component.

Popular online forum NTBugtraq this week filled with discussion about problems many users are experiencing when applying Microsoft's MDAC patch to servers and workstations.

One vendor, ConfigureSoft Inc., has its own take on the issue. According to Randy Streu, the company's vice president of product management, the problem isn't the patch itself but three of Microsoft's scanning and patch tools: Baseline Security Analyzer, SUS and Windows Update. All three are misfiring in the MDAC patching process. MDAC is a software component broadly used in Microsoft applications to gain database access.

According to ConfigureSoft, the tools are failing to tell the user they have to upgrade their machines, for instance by adding a particular Microsoft Service Pack, in order to apply the patch.

"These tools don't detect the dependency issue. It's the complications of 15 or so combinations for MDAC -- versions like 2.5, 2.6, or 2.7 that might need a particular Service Pack," says Streu. ConfigureSoft, which makes its own tool Security Manager Update, has been testing the application of the patch with the Microsoft tools.

Without the right Service Pack level, "the patch won't take," said Streu. The three Microsoft tools "won't even let you know you need to install the patch."

HFNetChk, a free tool made by Shavlik Technologies that's posted on Microsoft's Web site, does work properly with the MDAC patch, according to ConfigureSoft.

Microsoft said it was looking into some complaints it had heard associated with MDAC but said there had been no widespread problems reported in installing MDAC. Microsoft does encourage customers in the U.S. and Canada with patching problems to call product support at 1-866-PCSAFETY. Microsoft also said it is looking further into the questions raised about its patching tools and MDAC.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Ellen Messmer

Network World
Comments are now closed.

Latest News Articles

Most Popular Articles

Follow Us

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Resources

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Compare & Save

Deals powered by WhistleOut
Use WhistleOut's technology to compare:
Mobile phone plans & deals
Mobile phone models
Mobile phone carriers
Broadband plans & deals
Broadband providers
Deals powered by WhistleOut
WhistleOut

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?