Make sure your Cloud provider communicates

Cloud provider transparency is important at all times, but all the more vital when things go wrong.

Last week's outage of Amazon's Elastic Cloud Compute, and specifically the company's lack of communications around that outage, point out the importance of transparency when working with a cloud provider.

For the most part, Amazon's communication with customers through the outage was done through its Service Health Dashboard. Aside from that, communications from the company were terribly lacking.

While there's no doubt that job one was to find the problems and get customers back up and running as quickly as possible, Amazon would have done its own name and the name of the cloud as a computing model a great deal of good had they been more transparent with their users and the general public through the process.

Even today, fully a week after the outages began, neither Amazon's Web Services blog not the blog of Amazon CTO Werner Vogels have been updated with any information about what went wrong.

But even if it were suddenly filled with information and details on what went wrong and the steps that will be taken to ensure it won't happen again, it's shutting the barn doors after the horses have run free. Amazon should have been actively communicating with its customers and its customers' customers while the battle was still being fought.

In a blog post, Throsten von Eicken of cloud management services provider RightScale calls Amazon's lack of communications through the process "the biggest failure in this event," and offers a list of improvements that would make future outages more bearable.

Moving to the more distributed model of cloud computing is a leap of faith. You're trusting another organization to ensure that your resources are accessible. And when things go wrong, the only thing that's going to maintain that trust is as-it-happens communications that are as transparent as possible.

If you're looking to move to a more cloud-like environment or otherwise outsource your IT infrastructure, there are a lot of things to think about when dealing with a prospective vendor. Making sure the service level agreements (SLAs) meet your needs and expectations is key. But whether you're planning on outsourcing to a cloud giant like Amazon or a local service provider, it's worth taking some time to find out how they communicate with their customers. Particularly when things go wrong.

Look for vendors that are proactive with support and communications, particularly if the workload you're looking at outsourcing is of the mission critical variety. That way at least if things go wrong, you won't be left sitting around wondering what's going on and when you can expect to be back up and running.

There's still a lot to like about Amazon EC2. In many ways, the fact that some downtime is so newsworthy is a testament to the kind of uptime the service has enjoyed. It's like a plane crash being so much more newsworthy than a car accident, largely because air travel is so much safer than being on the road.

But in those rare, unfortunate instances when things do go wrong, you want your airline to keep you informed as quickly as possible while events are still unfolding. You should expect the same kind of transparency for your cloud provider as well.

Robert Dutt is a veteran IT journalist and blogger. He covers the Canadian IT technology solution provider scene daily at ChannelBuzz.ca . You can also find him on Twitter .

Join the PC World newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags Amazon Web ServicesserversCloudhardware systemsinternetcloud computingserver

Struggling for Christmas presents this year? Check out our Christmas Gift Guide for some top tech suggestions and more.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Robert Dutt

PC World (US online)

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Shopping.com

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?