SAP to argue for new trial in Oracle lawsuit

The company will argue in court Wednesday it suffered a 'miscarriage of justice'

Lawyers for Oracle and SAP are due in court Wednesday to argue post-trial motions in their TomorrowNow lawsuit, with SAP seeking a new trial and a reduction of the US$1.3 billion jury award it was ordered to pay.

SAP contends the award granted to Oracle last November was "a miscarriage of justice" and "grossly excessive" based on the evidence presented at trial. It wants the court to reduce the damages to no more than $408 million.

Oracle has countered that the trial was fair and the verdict proper, and that SAP's motions "do little more than ask the Court to reverse legal rulings it has made and substitute SAP's interpretation of the evidence for the jury's decision."

The arguments, laid out in court papers earlier this year, are scheduled to begin at 9 a.m. Pacific Time in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California before Judge Phyllis Hamilton, who is overseeing the case.

Oracle sued SAP four years ago after it discovered SAP's TomorrowNow subsidiary had been downloading Oracle software and support materials illegally from an Oracle website. SAP never contested the downloads, and the trial was over how much it should pay.

The jury award was based on a so-called "hypothetical license," or the amount SAP would have paid had it licensed the software legally from Oracle at the time of the theft. Oracle Chairman and CEO Larry Ellison testified in court that such a license would have cost SAP $4 billion.

SAP wants the court to rule "as a matter of law" that Oracle was not entitled to a hypothetical license because it never would have agreed to such a license with SAP in the first place, and because, in any case, the amount was based on speculation.

Oracle said those arguments have already been rejected by the court and the jury. "First, as a matter of law, SAP is not allowed to re-argue the facts. ... Second, the evidence, viewed collectively -- as it must be -- was more than sufficient to support the jury's award (or even a higher one)," Oracle's lawyers wrote.

Oracle strongly opposes a new trial, but if one is granted, it wants it to include additional damages, including any "up-sell and cross-sell" profits Oracle may have lost as a result of the theft, which it says were improperly excluded from the first trial.

Judge Hamilton could rule on some of the motions in court Wednesday or take several weeks to consider the arguments. Depending on the outcome, SAP has said it intends to file a full appeal in the case. In the meantime, the damages awarded to Oracle are being held in escrow.

James Niccolai covers data centers and general technology breaking news for IDG News Service. Follow James on Twitter at @jniccolai. James's e-mail address is james_niccolai@idg.com

Tags applicationsenterprise resource planningcopyrightintellectual propertylegalCivil lawsuitspatentSAPsoftwareOracle

Recommended

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

James Niccolai

IDG News Service

Comments

Comments are now closed.

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?