Google cites Schmidt testimony in Android suit defense

Google wants Java infringement claims to be tossed out of court, using previous testimony from former Google CEO Eric Schmidt

Google wants a judge to throw out Java copyright infringement claims Oracle has lodged against the Android mobile OS, based partly on 17-year-old testimony from an unlikely source: Google executive chairman and former CEO Eric Schmidt.

"With respect to intellectual property rights, Sun strongly believes in -- and will defend -- the rights of intellectual property owners to maximize their returns on product implementations. At the same time, we believe that interface specifications are not protectable under copyright," Schmidt testified to Congress in 1994 while he was CTO of Java's previous owner, Sun Microsystems, according to a filing Google made late Monday in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

Meanwhile, "Oracle's copyright claim rests almost entirely on the use of the interface specifications (specifications for application programming interfaces, or APIs) in thirty-seven Java language API packages in Android," Google said.

Beyond the API specifications, Oracle is basing its copyright claim on "minimal alleged copying, concerning only 12 files out of over 50 thousand in Android," Google said. "A reasonable jury could only conclude that any such similarities are de minimis and thus not actionable."

Oracle spokeswoman Deborah Hellinger declined comment Tuesday on Google's filing.

A hearing on Google's motion is scheduled for Sept. 15.

Google's attempt to strike the copyright allegations is just the latest chapter in the case, which has been marked by a steady stream of colorful and sometimes acrimonious back-and-forth between the companies.

On Monday, U.S. District Court Judge William Alsup ruled that a draft e-mail that could potentially damage Google's position must remain public.

"What we've actually been asked to do by Larry and Sergey is to investigate what technology alternatives exist to Java for Android and Chrome," Google engineer Tim Lindholm wrote in the August 2010 e-mail, referring to Google co-founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin. "We've been over a hundred of these and think they all suck. We conclude that we need to negotiate a license for Java."

Google had argued that the e-mail was subject to attorney-client privilege and shouldn't have been disclosed, but Alsup disagreed.

Oracle, which filed suit against Google in August 2010, also alleges that Android violates seven Java patents.

An Oracle expert originally concluded that Google would owe it up to US$6.1 billion, according to Google. But Alsup has ordered Oracle to reduce the scope of its damages claim, saying the expert overreached.

The case is set to go to trial on Oct. 31, although Alsup has indicated he'd prefer the sides reach a settlement before then.

Chris Kanaracus covers enterprise software and general technology breaking news for The IDG News Service. Chris's e-mail address is

Join the PC World newsletter!

Error: Please check your email address.

Tags business issuesopen sourceapplication developmentLanguages and standardstelecommunicationSun MicrosystemsCivil lawsuitsAndroidmobileOracleGoogleintellectual propertyMobile OSeslegaleric schmidtsoftware

Our Back to Business guide highlights the best products for you to boost your productivity at home, on the road, at the office, or in the classroom.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Chris Kanaracus

IDG News Service
Show Comments

Cool Tech

D-Link PowerLine AV2 2000 Gigabit Network Kit

Learn more >

ASUS ROG Swift PG279Q – Reign beyond virtual world

Learn more >

D-Link TAIPAN AC3200 Ultra Wi-Fi Modem Router (DSL-4320L)

Learn more >

Crucial® BX200 SATA 2.5” 7mm (with 9.5mm adapter) Internal Solid State Drive

Learn more >

Lexar® Professional 1000x microSDHC™/microSDXC™ UHS-II cards

Learn more >

Gadgets & Things


Learn more >

Lexar Professional 2000x SDHC™/SDXC™ UHS-II cards

Learn more >

Lexar® Professional 1000x microSDHC™/microSDXC™ UHS-II cards

Learn more >

Family Friendly

Lexar® Professional 1000x microSDHC™/microSDXC™ UHS-II cards

Learn more >

Lexar Professional 2000x SDHC™/SDXC™ UHS-II cards

Learn more >

ASUS VivoPC VM62 - Incredibly Powerful, Unbelievably Small

Learn more >

Stocking Stuffer

Lexar® Professional 1000x microSDHC™/microSDXC™ UHS-II cards

Learn more >

Lexar Professional 2000x SDHC™/SDXC™ UHS-II cards

Learn more >

Christmas Gift Guide

Click for more ›

Most Popular Reviews

Best Deals on PC World

Latest News Articles


GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy


First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni


For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell


The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi


The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott


My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.


Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?