Experts: AT&T acquisition of T-Mobile may not be dead yet

AT&T could reach an agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice or prevail in a trial, some telecom experts say

The U.S. Department of Justice's lawsuit opposing AT&T's proposed acquisition of T-Mobile USA may not mean the end of the deal, according to some experts.

The DOJ, in the lawsuit filed Wednesday, said the merger of two of the nation's four largest mobile carriers would significantly reduce competition and lead to higher prices.

But the DOJ's 25-page antitrust complaint filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia reads more like a move toward a settlement than a document leading to a trial, said David Balto, an antitrust attorney and former policy director at the U.S. Federal Trade Commission. "A lawsuit doesn't mean a trial," said Balto, who has supported the merger.

The DOJ's lawsuit is "really a negotiating ploy to really put themselves in a stronger position to negotiate a consent decree," he added. "This isn't a case that can't be fixed."

Sprint Nextel, Public Knowledge and several other opponents of the US$39 billion merger have argued that no number of concessions by AT&T can overcome the loss of a low-cost competitor in the U.S. mobile market.

AT&T has promised to fight the DOJ's lawsuit. AT&T plans to "ask for an expedited hearing so the enormous benefits of this merger can be fully reviewed," Wayne Watts, the carrier's general counsel, said in a statement Wednesday. "The DOJ has the burden of proving alleged anti-competitive effects and we intend to vigorously contest this matter in court."

If the case does go to trial, Balto expects the trial to start soon, possibly by the end of the year. Judge Ellen Segal Huvelle has a history of asking tough questions of the DOJ in antitrust cases, he said.

Maury Mechanick, a telecom lawyer at the White & Case law firm in Washington, D.C., agreed that AT&T still has options. The company could reach a settlement with the DOJ or it could prevail in a trial, he said. AT&T has a large incentive to press forward, he said.

AT&T has committed to pay T-Mobile a $3 billion breakup fee, in addition to giving it spectrum, if the deal is not completed by September 2012, according to published reports.

However, a court case could drag out for months, or even years, Mechanick said. Even if the DOJ loses its lawsuit in court, the agency could appeal. "Litigation -- even if one of the parties wants it to move quickly -- is a slow, laborious process," he said.

The U.S. Federal Communications Commission still has not completed its review of the deal, and the FCC could seek its own concessions from AT&T, he said.

If the proceedings drag out until late 2012 or 2013, the deal may no longer make as much sense for both companies, Mechanick said. "The question becomes, how tolerant are they of that delay?" he said.

AT&T could propose a restructured deal, with the carrier keeping T-Mobile's spectrum and spinning off the rest of the company to carriers such as Sprint, added Jeff Kagan, an independent telecom analyst. The DOJ, however, may not approve that kind of deal either, he said.

AT&T could still "come back with a 'hail Mary,' all-or-nothing offer," he said. "All they really want is T-Mobile spectrum. The rest was just noise anyway."

AT&T took a "very arrogant" position on regulatory approval of the deal, Kagan added. "They never in their wildest dreams thought it would be turned down," he said. "This was a shock to them."

Grant Gross covers technology and telecom policy in the U.S. government for The IDG News Service. Follow Grant on Twitter at GrantGross. Grant's e-mail address is grant_gross@idg.com.

Tags antitrusttelecommunicationU.S. District Court for the District of ColumbiaEllen Segal HuvelleWayne WattsJeff KaganMergers and acquisitions3g4gat&tlegalsprint nextelU.S. Federal Communications CommissionDavid Baltogovernmentbroadbandbusiness issuesU.S. Department of JusticeMaury MechanickU.S. Federal Trade CommissionregulationT-Mobile USAmobilePublic KnowledgeWhite & Case

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Grant Gross

IDG News Service

Comments

Comments are now closed.

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Shopping.com

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?