Leaked exploit prompts researcher to publish blueprint for critical RDP vulnerability

The leaked exploit for a critical Remote Desktop Protocol vulnerability originated with Microsoft, a researcher says

Luigi Auriemma, the researcher who discovered a recently patched critical vulnerability in Microsoft's Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP), published a proof-of-concept exploit for it after a separate working exploit, which he said possibly originated from Microsoft, was leaked online on Friday.

Identified as CVE-2012-0002 and patched by Microsoft on Tuesday, the critical vulnerability can be exploited remotely to execute arbitrary code on systems that accept RDP connections.

Security experts have expressed concern because exploiting this vulnerability does not require authentication, which means that it can be used to create a computer worm.

However, the fact that RDP is disabled by default on Windows workstations limits the number of potential targets, so we shouldn't worry about the next Conficker, said Carsten Eiram, chief security specialist at Danish vulnerability research firm Secunia.

Even so, the vulnerability still presents an interest for attackers because the RDP service is commonly used in enterprise environments and is usually accessible through firewalls.

"This is an attractive vulnerability from an exploitation standpoint and various parties are spending significant resources on developing reliable exploits for this," Eiram said.

Creating a working exploit for the CVE-2012-0002 vulnerability is not trivial, Microsoft security engineers Suha Can and Jonathan Ness said in a blog post on Tuesday. "We would be surprised to see one developed in the next few days. However, we expect to see working exploit code developed within the next 30 days."

However, an exploit appeared earlier Friday on a Chinese file hosting website, and its creator is most likely Microsoft itself, Auriemma said. "The executable PoC [proof-of-concept exploit] was compiled in November 2011 and contains some debugging strings like MSRC11678, which is a clear reference to the Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC)."

Furthermore, the exploit sends a special packet that is identical to the one the researcher included in his report to ZDI (Zero Day Initiative), a program that pays researchers for vulnerability reports and later shares the details with the affected vendors. Auriemma is sure it's the same packet because it contains unique elements that he added to it.

The researcher believes that Microsoft created the exploit for internal testing and then shared it with other security vendors through its Microsoft Active Protections Program (MAPP) to enable them to create attack and malware signatures.

The file might have been leaked by one of those companies or by a Microsoft employee, either directly or indirectly, Auriemma said. There is also the possibility of a hacker stealing it from Microsoft, but that's unlikely, he added.

A representative of Waggener Edstrom, Microsoft's external public relations firm, said that he had contacted the company for comment after being asked about the matter, but a couple of hours later, Microsoft had not yet issued a statement.

However, in light of the unusual leak, Auriemma decided to release his original PoC exploit together with an advisory that pinpoints the vulnerability's exact location. The PoC is pretty basic, but an experienced exploit writer can modify it to achieve remote code execution, the researcher said.

"The release of a PoC does not necessarily make it easy to exploit the vulnerability, but it does provide a solid starting point," Secunia's Eiram said. "Having access to the patches already makes it possible to deduce the vulnerability details via bindiffing (i.e. comparing the patched binaries to unpatched binaries), but concluding how to trigger the vulnerability is not always so straight-forward. Having a PoC available, obviously, makes this very clear."

System administrators who haven't installed the patch for CVE-2012-0002 are strongly advised to do so, or at least to deploy one of the workarounds described by Microsoft in its MS12-020 security bulletin.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Lucian Constantin

IDG News Service
Comments are now closed.

Latest News Articles

Most Popular Articles

Follow Us

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Resources

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?