Google AdWords case goes to Australia's High Court

The court will decide whether Google deceived consumers by allowing companies to make AdWords purchases of names belonging to competitors

Australia's High Court on Tuesday began hearing Google's appeal of a ruling that it sold misleading advertisements that allowed companies to purchase keywords containing competitor's names.

The case was brought by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) in 2007 after it found 11 advertisements that contained business names, product names or web addresses for a competitor's business which had not bought AdWords advertisements from Google.

Google prevailed in October 2011, when a Federal Court judge found that some of the advertisements were misleading but that Google had only presented the representations of the advertisers.

The ACCC appealed. On April 3, the Full Federal Court ordered that Google put in place a consumer compliance program after it found four advertisements that were misleading or deceptive and breached Australia's Trade Practices Act of 1974.

Keywords for AdWords are sold by auction and are then matched to people's search queries. With the four advertisements cited by the Full Federal Court, searches for a company's name brought up sponsored links containing the name, but the advertisements lead to the websites of a competitor who had paid for the ads.

In its defense, Google had said it was a publisher that was not responsible for the content and representations made by AdWords purchasers.

The High Court, in Canberra, is not expected to release a ruling for a few months after the hearings conclude, according to an ACCC spokesman.

Send news tips and comments to jeremy_kirk@idg.com

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Jeremy Kirk

IDG News Service

Comments

Comments are now closed.

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?