EU data watchdog: We need to define illegal content

Notice and action requests are not always the right move, data protection supervisor

Europe's top data protection watchdog has said that the concept of "illegal content" must be uniformly defined throughout the European Union.

The European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS), Peter Hustinx, was responding to plans by the European Commission to reform rules on "notice and action" requests -- the removal of illegal content online.

In a statement, the EDPS said that he was concerned that hosting service providers may be forced to process sensitive personal data when removing illegal content, which the Commission defines as intellectual property rights infringements; consumer protection law breaches; hate incitement; child abuse content; terrorism-related content; defamatory material, and privacy-invading material.

Hustinx also questioned whether "notice and action" requests to content hosts, including social networking sites such as Facebook or user-generated content hosts like YouTube, is always the best approach. "For instance, privacy infringements could be best reported to data protection authorities," he said. And some infringements such as child abuse content and terrorism-related content would require the involvement of law enforcement agencies.

Under the E-Commerce Directive, online content hosts are not liable for illegal content created by others, but are required to act to remove the material if notified of its existence. In his statement, the EDPS again underlined the need to be circumspect when proposing pro-active measures to be taken by hosting service providers to prevent illegal content.

"The E-Commerce Directive clearly sets forth that service providers do not have a general obligation 'to monitor the information which they transmit or store, nor a general obligation actively to seek facts or circumstances indicating illegal activity.' The Court of Justice of the EU has emphasized this principle in several case," said Hustinx.

Follow Jennifer on Twitter at @BrusselsGeek or email tips and comments to jennifer_baker@idg.com.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Jennifer Baker

IDG News Service

Comments

Comments are now closed.

Most Popular Reviews

Follow Us

Best Deals on GoodGearGuide

Shopping.com

Latest News Articles

Resources

GGG Evaluation Team

Kathy Cassidy

STYLISTIC Q702

First impression on unpacking the Q702 test unit was the solid feel and clean, minimalist styling.

Anthony Grifoni

STYLISTIC Q572

For work use, Microsoft Word and Excel programs pre-installed on the device are adequate for preparing short documents.

Steph Mundell

LIFEBOOK UH574

The Fujitsu LifeBook UH574 allowed for great mobility without being obnoxiously heavy or clunky. Its twelve hours of battery life did not disappoint.

Andrew Mitsi

STYLISTIC Q702

The screen was particularly good. It is bright and visible from most angles, however heat is an issue, particularly around the Windows button on the front, and on the back where the battery housing is located.

Simon Harriott

STYLISTIC Q702

My first impression after unboxing the Q702 is that it is a nice looking unit. Styling is somewhat minimalist but very effective. The tablet part, once detached, has a nice weight, and no buttons or switches are located in awkward or intrusive positions.

Latest Jobs

Shopping.com

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?